How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
ℓ2 sample/query access to vectors and matrices
Definition
For a finite complex vector , put , where is the complex modulus of Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus. Its squared-entry distribution is on when . A vector has ℓ2 sample/query access when the interface supplies: (a) an entry query returning ; (b) its norm ; and (c) a sample distributed according to . For any finite adaptive sequence of sample calls, conditioned on the preceding history and the current requested sampler, each returned index has the declared law and uses fresh randomness independent of that history; in particular, repeated calls to a fixed sampler are mutually independent in the sense of Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables. Every draw is charged. The interface states the cost and precision of every query, norm computation, and sample, and any preprocessing or storage cost. If , is undefined and the sampler returns the explicit status ZERO; it does not return a fictitious normalized sample.
For a finite real matrix , put , the Frobenius norm of The Frobenius norm on real or complex matrices. Row and column ℓ2 access supplies entry queries, row and column norms, and samplers for each nonzero row and column according to its squared-entry distribution. These real rows and columns are instances of the vector interface above. It also declares preprocessing, storage, and whether their costs are amortized. The common row sampler has law for , and the column sampler has law ; zero rows and columns have probability zero. An all-zero matrix returns ZERO for a request for a norm-normalized sample. All row-vector, column-vector, matrix-level row, and matrix-level column samplers obey the same conditional fresh-randomness rule; every draw is charged. Access to entries alone does not imply either sampler. The access and output costs are recorded separately under Classical output, quantum-state output, and access costs, and the distributions are finite probability laws as in Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities.
This is an input-data structure assumption. It is not a quantum circuit, state-preparation oracle, QRAM, or an assertion that the preprocessing needed to implement it is sublinear. The Tang matrix algorithms on this page specialize to real matrices; no complex-matrix extension of those algorithms is asserted.
Depends on
- Classical output, quantum-state output, and access costs
- Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities
- Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables
- Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus
- The Frobenius norm $\lVert A\rVert_F=(\sum_{i,j}|a_{ij}|^2)^{1/2}$ on real or complex matrices
Used by
- Finite rejection sampler for a linear combination Algorithm
- ModFKV low-rank description procedure Algorithm
- Entry queries alone do not provide Tang's sampling access Counterexample
- Squared-vector distributions are close in total variation Lemma
- Two-stage ℓ2 sampling controls Gram matrices Lemma
- Estimate an inner product from ℓ2-sampling access Proposition
- Correctness and cost of the linear-combination sampler Theorem
- ModFKV low-rank approximation supplier Theorem
- Tang's conditional recommendation sampler Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ewin Tang, A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems, version 3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alan Frieze, Ravi Kannan, and Santosh Vempala, Fast Monte-Carlo Algorithms for Finding Low-Rank Approximations, full author manuscript (standard reference, not scraped)