Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

ModFKV low-rank approximation supplier

Statement

Let A∈Rm×n be nonzero, F=∥A∥F, and suppose it has the exact row/column ℓ2 sample/query access of ℓ2 sample/query access to vectors and matrices. Let 0<σ≤F, 0<ϵ≤14σ/F, ϵ2≤η≤1, and 0<δ<1. Set K=F2/σ2 and ϵˉ=ηϵ2. For a sufficiently large universal constant in the sample count q=Θ ⁣(K4ϵˉ2log⁡2δ), the procedure ModFKV low-rank description procedure outputs a description of a rank-at-most-K matrix D=ASTU^Σ^−2U^TS such that, with probability at least 1−δ, there is a threshold-band target Aσ,η from Threshold-band singular-value approximation satisfying ∥D−Aσ,η∥F≤ϵF. The ModFKV description itself queries O(q2) matrix entries and computes an SVD of a q×q matrix at O(q3) arithmetic cost, before any later sampling from D's rows. These operation counts use the stated exact-access arithmetic model and do not include unprovided preprocessing for the input access structure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The matrix, exact access, and parameters of the Statement.

[F1]

Exponential Frobenius concentration for normalized Gram sampling controls both Gram errors with probability at least 1−δ, and proves ∥S∥F=∥W∥F=F exactly.

[F2]

A deterministic threshold-band bound for two Gram sketches gives the retained rank, near-isometry, and the threshold-band error from these two Gram errors.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Set t=ϵˉ/(1000K2). Choose the integer q=⌈106K4ϵˉ−2(1+2log⁡(2/δ))2⌉. This has the asserted Θ order, uniformly for 0<δ<1, and [F1] gives both Gram errors at most tF2 except on an event of probability at most δ. The algorithm's mixture probability equals ∥S∗,j∥2/F2, so a zero-probability column is never drawn and its INVALID branch has probability zero.

2.1givenF2step 1.1algebra

Since K≥1, η≤1 and ϵ≤1/4, tK≤1/2. On the event in step 1.1, [F2] applies to the actual strictly retained singular values and to M=STUΣ−2UTS. It gives rank at most K and a threshold-band target with error at most F(tK+77tK/η)≤F(ϵ2/1000+ϵ77/1000)≤ϵF. Empty retention returns zero and is included in [F2]. No gap between actual singular values is assumed.

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The q row samples, q mixture samples and the probabilities of the sampled columns can be obtained using at most O(q2) input queries: each mixture probability sums q known row probabilities and queried squared entries. Forming W uses q2 entries; its exact-arithmetic SVD and the stored matrices require O(q3) arithmetic. These costs give the stated counts for the description and make no claim to materialize A, S or D in full.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources