Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exponential Frobenius concentration for normalized Gram sampling

Statement

Let A≠0, F=∥A∥F, and let S,W be its exact normalized two-stage sketches in Two-stage ℓ2 sampling controls Gram matrices, using q≥1 samples at each stage. For 0<δ<1 and t>0, if q≥t−2(1+2log⁡(2/δ))2, then, with probability at least 1−δ, both ∥ATA−STS∥F≤tF2,∥SST−WWT∥F≤tF2. Deterministically ∥S∥F=∥W∥F=F. The confidence bound has no matrix-dimension factor.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite sampling laws, exact sketch normalization, and parameters in the Statement.

[F1]

Two-stage ℓ2 sampling controls Gram matrices proves the normalized Gram estimator is unbiased and has squared Frobenius mean error at most F4/q, at both sampling stages, with the second statement conditional on S.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

We first prove a finite bounded-differences estimate. If a centered finite real variable Y lies in an interval of length c, let h(s)=log⁡EesY. Differentiating finite sums shows h′′(s) is the variance under the weights proportional to esY. Any variable in [a,b] has variance at most E[(Y−(a+b)/2)2]≤(b−a)2/4. Thus h′′(s)≤c2/4; since h(0)=h′(0)=0, integration gives EesY≤es2c2/8 for all real s.

2.1step 1.1F2algebraconstruct

Suppose a real function f of independent finite samples changes by at most cj if sample j is replaced. Reveal samples in order and let Mj be the finite conditional mean of f. For each fixed earlier history, the possible values of Mj lie in an interval of length at most cj, since averaging the future preserves the coordinate oscillation bound. Therefore Mj−Mj−1 is conditionally centered in an interval of that length. Applying step 1.1 conditionally and summing over successive histories gives Ees(f−Ef)≤es2∑jcj2/8. Markov applied to this exponential, followed by s=4u/∑jcj2, gives P(f−Ef≥u)≤e−2u2/∑jcj2 when u>0 and the denominator is positive. If all cj=0, f is constant on the product support and its upper tail is zero.

3.1givenF1F2step 2.1algebra

For a finite random vector X with ∥X∥2=L identically, set Z=q−1∑jXjXjT and H=EXXT. Independence cancels the mixed centered terms, and ∥XXT∥F2=L2, so E∥Z−H∥F2≤L2/q. By [F2], E∥Z−H∥F≤L/q. Replacing one Xj changes ∥Z−H∥F by at most 2L/q, by the triangle inequality. Step 2.1 now gives P(∥Z−H∥F>L(1+2log⁡(2/δ))/q)≤δ/2.

4.1givenF1step 3.1algebra∎

The row sampling is step 3.1 with X=Ai,∗T/DA(i) and L=F2. Every row of S has squared norm F2/q, so ∥S∥F=F. Its column mixture probability is ∥S∗,j∥2/F2; hence every normalized sampled column of W has squared norm F2/q, and ∥W∥F=F. Conditional on every realized S, step 3.1 applies to the column sampling with the same L=F2 and failure bound δ/2. Averaging that bound over the finite row histories and adding the first-stage failure bound proves the assertion. Zero-probability rows and columns are never selected and require no division by zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources