How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exponential Frobenius concentration for normalized Gram sampling
Statement
Let , , and let be its exact normalized two-stage sketches in Two-stage ℓ2 sampling controls Gram matrices, using samples at each stage. For and , if then, with probability at least , both Deterministically . The confidence bound has no matrix-dimension factor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite sampling laws, exact sketch normalization, and parameters in the Statement.
Two-stage ℓ2 sampling controls Gram matrices proves the normalized Gram estimator is unbiased and has squared Frobenius mean error at most , at both sampling stages, with the second statement conditional on .
Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation gives on a finite probability space. Markov's inequality on a finite probability space bounds a nonnegative variable's upper tail by its mean divided by the threshold.
Proof
We first prove a finite bounded-differences estimate. If a centered finite real variable lies in an interval of length , let . Differentiating finite sums shows is the variance under the weights proportional to . Any variable in has variance at most . Thus ; since , integration gives for all real .
Suppose a real function of independent finite samples changes by at most if sample is replaced. Reveal samples in order and let be the finite conditional mean of . For each fixed earlier history, the possible values of lie in an interval of length at most , since averaging the future preserves the coordinate oscillation bound. Therefore is conditionally centered in an interval of that length. Applying step 1.1 conditionally and summing over successive histories gives . Markov applied to this exponential, followed by , gives when and the denominator is positive. If all , is constant on the product support and its upper tail is zero.
For a finite random vector with identically, set and . Independence cancels the mixed centered terms, and , so . By [F2], . Replacing one changes by at most , by the triangle inequality. Step 2.1 now gives .
The row sampling is step 3.1 with and . Every row of has squared norm , so . Its column mixture probability is ; hence every normalized sampled column of has squared norm , and . Conditional on every realized , step 3.1 applies to the column sampling with the same and failure bound . Averaging that bound over the finite row histories and adding the first-stage failure bound proves the assertion. Zero-probability rows and columns are never selected and require no division by zero.
Depends on
- Two-stage ℓ2 sampling controls Gram matrices
- Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
- Markov's inequality on a finite probability space
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ewin Tang, A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems, version 3 (standard reference, not scraped)