How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ribbon evaluation from a colored braid word
Definition
An effective field is a field whose elements have finite encodings and whose exact addition, subtraction, multiplication, equality test, and inversion of nonzero elements are terminating procedures. Input a finite-dimensional strict matrix realization over an effective field of a -linear ribbon category with , finite-dimensional color objects with fixed bases, exact matrices for every braiding and inverse braiding used, the evaluation and coevaluation maps for the closure, the twist matrices, and the matrix of the ribbon-induced pivotal comparison for , where is the Drinfeld morphism. Also input a finite braid word on strands and the top color tuple . The matrices are assumed to satisfy the stated ribbon-category axioms; an implementation does not infer those axioms from arbitrary matrices.
Use the strand-position permutation homomorphism given by . Read the braid letters in composition order, updating the current color tuple at each crossing by swapping its adjacent colors. For a positive letter , use the matrix of and for a negative letter use , whose source adjacent factors are . Here the subscripts always refer to the current tuple before the swap. Let the blackboard-framed closure join the bottom and top endpoint at each position by the identity pairing. Reject the input if the final color tuple differs from the initial tuple: the tuple records the colors at the paired endpoints, so equality is exactly the condition that the closure carries a consistent color on every component. Starting with the identity matrix, multiply the typed crossing matrices in word order to obtain , then return the finite matrix contraction In ordinary dual-basis coordinates this contraction is the matrix trace . No algorithm is asserted for arbitrary abstract ribbon categories without effective finite matrix data.
Definition references
Correctness and termination of this procedure ↗
Mixed-color ribbon-tangle evaluation
Drinfeld morphism and its tensor relation
Balancing and ribbon dual compatibility
Duality maps and snake identities
Permutations of the strand labels
Turaev, Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds, Chapter I, Theorem 2.5 and §§3–4
Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, and Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §§8.9–8.10
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The effective field, valid finite-dimensional matrix ribbon data, the braid word, and its top color tuple.
For , the left categorical trace is the composite (The categorical trace of a morphism into the double dual).
The Drinfeld morphism is a natural isomorphism defined by the displayed evaluation/braiding/coevaluation composite, and satisfies (A braided rigid category has a Drinfeld morphism).
For current adjacent colors , the supplied positive crossing is and the negative crossing is . The matrices satisfy the ribbon-category axioms by the input condition.
For , is generated by with the Artin braid and distant-commutativity relations, and is trivial (The braid group by Artin presentation).
is the group of bijections of the strand-label set under composition, and is the transposition interchanging and (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition).
The twist is natural and satisfies and ribbon dual compatibility (Twist and ribbon structure).
The chosen evaluation and coevaluation maps satisfy the two snake identities (Left dual and right dual object).
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- V. G. Turaev, Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds, Chapter I, Theorem 2.5 and §§3–4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §§8.9–8.10 (standard reference, not scraped)