How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
UCRL2 for finite communicating MDPs
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the interaction path law. The learner is given a finite nonempty state set , a finite nonempty action set for each , the observed initial state , a horizon , a confidence parameter , and fixed orders of the states and each state's actions. Let and . Its unknown environment is a finite communicating MDP on and these action sets with rewards in ; the transition kernel, reward laws, and their means are not inputs to the learner. At interaction , the learner observes the current state , chooses an admissible action, and then observes the realized reward and next state .
Initialize and . At the start of episode , let be the total number of visits to before . If , let be the mean of the rewards observed on those visits and their empirical next-state law. If , set and set to the point mass at the first state in the fixed state order. Put and Set . Run extended value iteration with these estimates/radii and tolerance , obtaining a stationary deterministic policy . Set every within-episode count and execute the following loop. While , observe , choose , observe and , increment and the all-history count for , record this reward/transition observation, and retain the observed next state as the current state for the next interaction. Increment by one. End the episode immediately after an interaction when its pair's count reaches , where remains the episode-start count; if , begin the next episode, otherwise terminate. All action and transition-vector ties use the fixed orders.
Definition references
Extended value iteration: specifies the optimistic confidence-set Bellman updates and stopping rule.
Bounded-reward finite MDP: specifies the environment's reward and transition laws.
Communicating MDP and diameter: specifies the environment class.
UCRL2: §3, Figure 1.
Extended Value Iteration: §3.1.2, Figure 2 and equation (5).
Independent UCRL2 treatment: Chapter 10.3.1, printed pp. 224–228.
Finite EVI termination: proves that each positive-tolerance planning call returns.
Axiom of Choice: assumed for the interaction path law.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas Jaksch, Ronald Ortner, and Peter Auer, Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning (standard reference, not scraped)
- Christos Dimitrakakis and Ronald Ortner, Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)