How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-budget adaptive finite-state projection
Definition
Inputs. A given nonexplosive chain and initial law ; a finite positive integer and an explicitly supplied nested list of nonempty finite sets ; for each , its exact finite cemetery-lift generator and lifted initial vector from Killed finite-state projection and cemetery lift; final time ; tolerance ; a positive integer per-projection term cap ; and an arithmetic mode that is either exact real arithmetic or a validated arithmetic backend satisfying the requirements below and of Budgeted uniformization accumulation with time splitting.
The supplied lift data must be the exact rates and initial masses of the given chain. An implementation may obtain the cemetery rate from the exact exit rate minus the finite sum of within- rates. A validated backend must certify the lift-rate calculation and its admissibility, the solver's scalar and vector certificates, and an outward enclosure of each computed cemetery coordinate, including the certified arithmetic/algebraic error required by Uniformization truncation, mass loss, and arithmetic-error ledger; if any required certificate is unavailable, the corresponding projection is uncertified.
Procedure. For in order:
- Let for and set ; this includes the cemetery state's zero exit rate. If a validated backend cannot certify and its admissibility, treat the solver status as
certificate-unavailable. Otherwise apply Budgeted uniformization accumulation with time splitting to with admissible rate , positive tail budget , term cap , and the supplied arithmetic mode. If , use the solver's zero-rate branch. If the status isbudget-exhaustedorcertificate-unavailable, or the exact lift data are unavailable, returninconclusivewith the statuses and all completed projection records; do not skip an uncertified projection. - Let be the computed cemetery coordinate. If the solver returns tail and arithmetic/algebraic error bounds and , put , the total certified error bound. Form the outward-certified interval Record , , the computed vector, , , its tail bound , and its arithmetic/algebraic error .
- If exact comparison or validated interval arithmetic certifies , return
certifiedwith this projection and its record.
If all projections have valid records but none passes the tolerance, return inconclusive with every record. The algorithm uses at most projections and uniformization terms. It makes no claim that some finite projection outside this supplied list meets .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Brian Munsky and Mustafa Khammash, The Finite State Projection Algorithm for the Solution of the Chemical Master Equation (standard reference, not scraped)