Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniformization truncation, mass loss, and arithmetic-error ledger

Statement

Let Q be a finite column generator, p0 a column probability vector, and ν>0 an admissible rate. For λ=νt and K≥0, the exact one-series partial sum

uK(t):=∑k=0Ke−λλkk!Pkp0

is nonnegative and substochastic, and its exact ℓ1 distance from p(t) is the scalar Poisson tail τK(λ)=P(Pois⁡(λ)>K). If νt>0, the budgeted algorithm sets m=⌈νt⌉ and μ=νt/m≤1, and uses Rμ,K=∑k=0Ke−μμkPk/k!. Then Rμ,Kmp0 is nonnegative and substochastic, and its exact transient ℓ1 error is

1−(∑k=0Ke−μμkk!)m≤mτK(μ)≤mGK(μ).

If a computed vector u^ has a separately certified accumulated arithmetic/algebraic error Ealg:=∥u^−Rμ,Kmp0∥1, then ∥p(t)−u^∥1≤mGK(μ)+Ealg. In rounded arithmetic, if T is a validated upper bound for mGK(μ), then ∥p(t)−u^∥1≤T+Ealg. The geometric tail certificate is not obtained by floating-point subtraction from one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite column generator Q, a probability vector p0, an admissible ν>0, t≥0, and a finite truncation index K.

[F1]

The finite uniformized matrix is column stochastic: P=I+Q/ν is nonnegative and column stochastic.

[F2]

Finite master equation and uniformization formula: p(t)=etQp0 and etQ=∑k≥0e−νt(νt)kPk/k!.

[F3]

The scalar Poisson count law and Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law: the weights wk(μ)=e−μμk/k! are nonnegative and sum to one.

[F4]

A geometric upper bound for a Poisson right tail: τK(μ)≤GK(μ) when μ<K+2.

[F5]

The p-norms ∥x∥p for rational p≥1, and ∥x∥∞: the vector 1-norm is ∥x∥1=∑i∣xi∣.

[F7]

Budgeted uniformization accumulation with time splitting: with m substeps, the exact truncated vector is Rμ,Kmp0, the term count is at most B, rounded output carries a validated tail upper bound T≥mGK(μ), and any approximate vector carries its separate Ealg bound.

[F8]

Finite matrix exponential series and its identities: esQetQ=e(s+t)Q for real s,t.

Proof

technique · compare the full stochastic operator with its substochastic partial sum
1.1F1F2F3algebra

For any μ>0, set Sμ=eμQ/ν=e−μeμP and Rμ,K=∑k=0Kwk(μ)Pk. By [F1], each Pk is nonnegative and column stochastic; [F2] and [F3] give Sμ=∑k≥0wk(μ)Pk with nonnegative weights summing to one. Thus Rμ,K is nonnegative with common column sum sK:=∑k=0Kwk(μ)≤1, and Sμ−Rμ,K is nonnegative with common column sum τK(μ).

2.1F1F2F3F5F6step 1.1

The induced norm formula [F6] gives ∥Sμ∥1=1, ∥Rμ,K∥1=sK, and ∥Sμ−Rμ,K∥1=τK(μ). If λ=νt=0, only the k=0 Poisson weight is nonzero, so p(t)=uK(t)=p0 and the omitted mass is zero. If λ>0, apply step 1.1 with μ=λ: (Sλ−Rλ,K)p0 is nonnegative and its coordinate sum is τK(λ); by [F5], the exact one-series ℓ1 omitted mass is therefore exactly the scalar Poisson tail.

3.1F4F5F6step 2.1algebra

In the time-split algorithm, 0<μ≤1 and K≥0, so μ<K+2 and [F4] gives τK(μ)≤GK(μ). For m substeps the telescoping identity Sμm−Rμ,Km=∑j=0m−1Sμm−1−j(Sμ−Rμ,K)Rμ,Kj, [F5]–[F6], and step 2.1 give ∥Sμm−Rμ,Km∥1≤mτK(μ)≤mGK(μ).

4.1F1F3F5F6step 3.1algebra

Every term in the telescoping identity is nonnegative, so the exact vector error on p0 is nonnegative. Each column sum of Sμm is one and each column sum of Rμ,Km is sKm; hence its ℓ1 mass is exactly 1−sKm=1−(1−τK(μ))m≤mτK(μ). This proves the exact time-split lost-mass identity and the preceding error bound.

5.1F2F5F7F8step 4.1algebra∎

Since mμ=νt, [F8] gives Sμm=etQ and [F2] gives Sμmp0=p(t), while [F7] identifies the exact truncated output as Rμ,Kmp0. The triangle inequality for the vector 1-norm [F5] therefore yields ∥p(t)−u^∥1≤∥p(t)−Rμ,Kmp0∥1+∥Rμ,Kmp0−u^∥1≤mGK(μ)+Ealg≤T+Ealg when the validated upper bound T is supplied. If νt=0, the algorithm returns p0 and both error terms are zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources