Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The matrix norm induced by a published vector p-norm

Definition

Let m,n∈N, let p∈Q with p≥1, and let A=(aij)∈Mm×n(R) be a real matrix (Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes), regarded as the linear map x↦Ax from Rn to Rm with the published p-norms (The p-norms ∥x∥p for rational p≥1, and ∥x∥∞). The matrix p-norm induced by ∥⋅∥p is

∥A∥p  :=  sup⁡{ ∥Ax∥p  :  x∈Rn, ∥x∥p≤1 }.

When n≥1, the following three displayed quantities are the same number:

∥A∥p=sup⁡∥x∥p≤1∥Ax∥p=sup⁡∥x∥p=1∥Ax∥p=sup⁡x≠0∥Ax∥p∥x∥p,

the equalities following from positive homogeneity of ∥⋅∥p (Each ∥⋅∥p is a norm on Rn, and the induced metrics are exactly d1, d2 and d∞ of the published metric-spaces page, axiom (N2)) and the equality ∥0∥p=0.

The value is a finite nonnegative real. For n≥1 the norms ∥⋅∥p and ∥⋅∥2 are equivalent by For n≥1 all norms on Rn are equivalent, so there is C>0 with ∥x∥∞≤C∥x∥p for every x. For every i<m, ∣(Ax)i∣≤∑j<n∣aij∣ ∣xj∣≤(∑j<n∣aij∣)∥x∥∞≤C(∑j<n∣aij∣)∥x∥p, so ∥Ax∥p≤(∑i<m(∑j<n∣aij∣)p)1/pC∥x∥p; hence the supremum over the unit ball is at most the finite constant (∑i<m(∑j<n∣aij∣)p)1/pC.

The induced infinity norm is a separate named case. When m,n≥1, define

∥A∥∞  :=  sup⁡{ ∥Ax∥∞  :  x∈Rn, ∥x∥∞≤1 }.

As in the rational-p case, positive homogeneity gives

∥A∥∞=sup⁡∥x∥∞≤1∥Ax∥∞=sup⁡∥x∥∞=1∥Ax∥∞=sup⁡x≠0∥Ax∥∞∥x∥∞.

The supremum is finite because for every i<m one has ∣(Ax)i∣≤∑j<n∣aij∣ ∣xj∣≤(∑j<n∣aij∣)∥x∥∞, so

∥Ax∥∞≤max⁡i<m∑j<n∣aij∣ ∥x∥∞.

At n=0 the convention is explicit. The only element of R0 is the zero vector, the only matrix A∈Mm×0(R) is the empty matrix, and the unit-ball definition gives ∥A∥p=0. The unit sphere and the set of nonzero vectors are empty, so the two ratio formulas above are not asserted in this case.

The induced quantity is a norm on the matrix space Mm×n(R): for each rational p≥1, and likewise for the separately named ∞-case when m,n≥1, separation, absolute homogeneity and the triangle inequality follow from the same three axioms of the underlying vector norm (Each ∥⋅∥p is a norm on Rn, and the induced metrics are exactly d1, d2 and d∞ of the published metric-spaces page) through the defining supremum. The compatibility with matrix-vector multiplication, the submultiplicativity and the value on identity matrices are Induced matrix norms are compatible with matrix-vector multiplication, submultiplicative, and satisfy ||I|| = 1; the explicit value at p=1 and the separate ∞-formula are The induced 1-norm is the maximum column sum and the induced infinity-norm is the maximum row sum.

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources