How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Absolute and relative local condition numbers of a problem map
Definition
Let and be normed spaces over (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms) and let be a map. For and write
Define the worst amplification over perturbations of size at most by
so in every case.
For each fixed the map is nondecreasing as increases, so the infimum over all exists in . The absolute (local) condition number of at is
If and , the relative (local) condition number of at is
For the computed value of Absolute and relative forward error for an approximate value of a problem map, the quantity is the absolute backward error. When , the quotient is the relative backward error: the amount by which the data must be moved, relative to its size, for the computed answer to be exactly correct. At only the absolute backward error is defined. The condition number converts backward error into a bound on forward error; that conversion is Local conditioning times backward error controls forward error to first order.
Remarks
-
The infimum form is the limit of the supremum form. Because is monotone in , the infimum over equals the one-sided limit , which is the familiar definition of a condition number as the worst relative amplification of infinitesimal perturbations. The infimum formulation is used below because it is an honest value of the library's ordered arithmetic with no separate limit apparatus.
-
The value is allowed to be . An ill-posed (discontinuous) map has infinite condition number at a point of discontinuity; is a legitimate value and no arithmetic is performed with it. The first-order conversion theorem only yields a finite bound when .
-
Conditioning belongs to the problem, not to the algorithm. The condition number depends only on , the point , and the two norms; no algorithm enters its definition. The separate notion of stability belongs to an algorithm under an arithmetic model and is defined in Forward and backward stability for a problem family under an arithmetic model.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. N. Trefethen and D. Bau III, Numerical Linear Algebra, Lecture 12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- James Demmel, Math 221 Lecture 3: Vector Norms, Matrix Norms, and Condition Numbers (standard reference, not scraped)