How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The scalar Poisson count law
Definition
For a finite parameter , the Poisson count law is the probability measure on whose masses are when , and is the point mass at when . The normalization and the moment and generating-function identities used below are proved in Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law ↗. The separate extended convention for a Poisson point-process count on a Borel set of infinite intensity is that the count equals almost surely; it is not a finite Poisson probability law.
Depends on
Used by
- Budgeted uniformization accumulation with time splitting Algorithm
- Explicit Poisson tau-leaping with an invalid-state status Algorithm
- Exposure-parameterized Poisson law Definition
- Poisson and Cox point processes Definition
- A binomial guard prevents overdraw but changes Poisson noise Example
- A CLE can assign negative density near an empty population Example
- A finite-window Poisson process that terminates at time one Example
- A minimum-intensity coupling reduces a Poisson count correction Example
- A Poisson leap can make a pure-death population negative Example
- Exact and pseudo likelihoods for finite-window Poisson and Strauss models Example
- Homogeneous Poisson likelihood and a Hawkes intensity specification Example
- Poisson and Cox counts with the same mean on a finite window Example
- Three-state birth-death chain with a certified Poisson tail Example
- Two-state gating through uniformization Example
- A geometric upper bound for a Poisson right tail Lemma
- Conditional moments of one Poisson tau-leap increment Lemma
- Finite-window homogeneous Poisson construction and ordered event-time density Lemma
- First and second moments of a Poisson random integral Lemma
- Independent Brownian motion straightens a Poisson clock Lemma
- Mecke identity for a finite-intensity Poisson point process Lemma
- Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law Lemma
- One-step weak defect of finite-state Poisson tau-leaping Lemma
- Shared-minimum coupling of two Poisson counts Lemma
- Campbell, Laplace, Mecke, and Cox moment formulas Theorem
- Compensators, brackets, and jump-integral isometry for reaction counts Theorem
- Dominating thinning has the prescribed reaction law Theorem
- Existence of a locally finite Poisson point process Theorem
- Finite master equation and uniformization formula Theorem
- Finite-intensity Poisson-process existence and mixed-binomial law Theorem
- Mecke identity for locally finite Poisson point processes Theorem
- Strong invariance principle for geometrically ergodic chains Theorem
- Uniformization truncation, mass loss, and arithmetic-error ledger Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gunter Last and Mathew Penrose, Lectures on the Poisson Process, author-hosted 2017 version (standard reference, not scraped)
- Adrian Baddeley, Spatial Point Processes and their Applications, complete lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)