How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A CLE can assign negative density near an empty population
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Consider constant immigration with density jump and rate , where , , and the time horizon . Let be the count of a homogeneous Poisson point process on with intensity times Lebesgue measure, and set . For the associated constant-coefficient CLE, let be a standard Brownian motion and set . Its generator is and, with , its terminal marginal is Then almost surely, while the CLE marginal can be negative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , , the exact jump-count construction, the Brownian motion used to define , and the count and density-scaled model laws.
Finite-intensity Poisson-process existence and mixed-binomial law: a Poisson point process on a finite-intensity time interval exists, and its total count is Poisson with parameter equal to the intensity of that interval.
Poisson and Cox point processes: counts on disjoint Borel sets of a Poisson point process are independent and have Poisson laws with their respective intensity parameters.
The scalar Poisson count law and Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law: a count with law has masses , mean , and .
Density-scaled reaction jump and chemical Langevin generators: a jump of size at rate has generator ; its CLE coefficients are the drift and covariance rate .
Standard normal and normal laws: the law has density on .
Under AC, a standard continuous Brownian motion exists, and its increments over finite increasing time grids are independent normal variables with variance equal to the time increments. Brownian motion Existence of continuous Brownian motion
With the usual augmented natural filtration, the conditional law of the Brownian future depends on the past only through the current Brownian state. Future-path Markov property
The normal-law and Brownian constructions use AC, recorded as The Axiom of Choice.
Verification
Given: The inputs above, with .
By [F1], , so almost surely. The point-process counts on disjoint intervals are independent by [F2]. On an interval of length , put . By [F3], and ; also . For bounded , the multiple-count contribution to its expected increment is therefore . Dividing the zero/single-count expansion by gives the density-count generator , as in [F4].
Let be the Brownian motion in [F6] and define . By [F7] and the independent increments in [F6], is a continuous Markov process. For any with three bounded continuous derivatives, put . The Brownian increment is independent of the past and has variance . The density in [F5] has finite third absolute moment by substituting , so Taylor's formula therefore gives the generator in the Example. Also by [F6], so and .
The density in [F5] is even. The moments of orders one and three are absolutely integrable, as follows by substituting in the tail integrals, so symmetry gives . Since and at both infinities, integration by parts gives Expanding the Gaussian marginal in step 1.2 now gives
Reindexing the nonnegative Poisson mass series gives Using [F3] and yields
Subtracting the two moments in steps 2.2 and 2.1 gives Thus this exact marginal comparison has a weak discrepancy of order for the cubic payoff.
The CLE value is negative exactly when . The normal density is strictly positive on every nonempty interval, so this event has positive probability. As , continuity of the normal distribution and symmetry give The jump marginal remains nonnegative by step 1.1.
Notes
The cubic payoff is unbounded, so its exact discrepancy is not an application of Stopped density-scaled jump versus chemical Langevin weak model error, whose general estimate requires a bounded payoff and a smooth stopped backward solution. This example separates a solvable marginal calculation from that theorem's hypotheses.
Depends on
- Density-scaled reaction jump and chemical Langevin generators
- Poisson and Cox point processes
- Finite-intensity Poisson-process existence and mixed-binomial law
- The scalar Poisson count law
- Normalization, moments, and generating function of the Poisson count law
- Standard normal and normal laws
- The Axiom of Choice
- Brownian motion
- Existence of continuous Brownian motion
- Future-path Markov property
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Daniel T. Gillespie, Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tiejun Li, Lecture 21: Application in chemical reaction kinetics, Applied Stochastic Analysis course notes (standard reference, not scraped)