How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bijection of hom-sets that does not exhibit a cotensor
Statement refuted
If one finds the expected bijection of ordinary hom-sets for a candidate cotensor object, then the candidate is a cotensor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-object Cat-enriched witness from the theorem page.
There is a candidate object with the right underlying hom-set bijection but the wrong enriched hom-object, so it is not a cotensor (A bijection on underlying hom-sets need not exhibit a cotensor).
Counterexample
In the witness of [L1], the sole hom-category is the one-object category with endomorphism monoid , and the weight is the discrete two-object category. The candidate is the sole enriched object. Its underlying hom-set and the underlying set of are both singletons, so the required underlying bijection is present and is natural in the only test object.
The enriched cotensor property would require . This is impossible because the endomorphism monoids and are not isomorphic. Thus the candidate has the expected natural underlying hom-set bijection but is not a cotensor.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. M. Kelly, Basic Concepts of Enriched Category Theory, equation (3.45) (standard reference, not scraped)