How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bivector in need not be decomposable
Statement refuted
Every bivector is decomposable, that is, of the form .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard basis of and the bivector .
The wedge is a basis element of , hence nonzero, for independent vectors (In a finite-dimensional vector space, a decomposable wedge is nonzero exactly when its vectors are linearly independent).
The wedge product is associative and satisfies for vectors (Exterior multiplication is well defined, graded, associative, unital, and graded-commutative).
Counterexample
If were decomposable, then by [L2], .
For the displayed , compute , which is the nonzero basis vector of by [L1].
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 contradict each other, so the bivector is not decomposable.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Exterior Powers (standard reference, not scraped)