Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: ΛkV is canonically a subspace of V⊗k over every field

Statement

For every field F, every F-vector space V, and every k≥0, the kth exterior power ΛkV is canonically a linear subspace of the k-fold tensor power V⊗k: the antisymmetrization map

Alt⁡(v1∧⋯∧vk):=∑σ∈Sksgn⁡(σ) vσ(1)⊗⋯⊗vσ(k)

is a well-defined injective linear section of the quotient map π:V⊗k→ΛkV, for every field F.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, a vector space V with dim⁡V≥k≥2, the quotient map π, and the antisymmetrization Alt⁡.

[L1]

The exterior power is the quotient ΛkV=V⊗k/Wk with quotient map π (The kth exterior power as the tensor-power quotient by repeated-vector relations).

[L2]

Permuting the entries of a wedge multiplies it by the permutation sign (Exterior multiplication is well defined, graded, associative, unital, and graded-commutative).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1L1

By [L1], ΛkV is a quotient of V⊗k, and the structure map π is a surjection with nonzero kernel: for dim⁡V≥2 and k≥2, extend a nonzero vector v to a basis (v,e2,…,en); then the pure tensor v⊗v⊗e3⊗⋯⊗ek∈V⊗k (with the tail omitted when k=2) is nonzero yet π of it is v∧v∧e3∧⋯∧ek=0 because the first two entries repeat, so the canonical construction presents ΛkV as a quotient, not a subspace.

1.2

For the formula-defined antisymmetrization, [L2] gives

π(Alt⁡(v1∧⋯∧vk))=∑σsgn⁡(σ) vσ(1)∧⋯∧vσ(k)=∑σ(sgn⁡σ)2 v1∧⋯∧vk=k! v1∧⋯∧vk.

[L2, algebra]

2.1step 1.1step 1.2

Over a field whose characteristic divides k!, step 1.2 gives π∘Alt⁡=k!⋅id⁡=0, while ΛkV≠0 by the hypothesis dim⁡V≥k; a section must satisfy π∘s=id⁡, so Alt⁡ is not a section over such a field. The concrete witness is F=F2, V=F22, k=2: Alt⁡(e1∧e2)=e1⊗e2+e2⊗e1 and π of that is 2 e1∧e2=0.

3.1step 2.1∎

Step 2.1 gives a field F, a vector space V, and a degree k for which the displayed formula is not a section of π, so the universal claim "for every field" is false.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources