How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A cell decomposition without the weak topology need not be a CW complex
Statement refuted
A closure-finite decomposition into characteristic cells is automatically a CW complex.
Counterexample
Given: The Hawaiian earring in its subspace topology, decomposed into its common vertex and the punctured constituent circles.
Proof technique: direct.
Each punctured circle is the image of the interior of a characteristic interval, and its closed circle meets only itself and the common vertex. Thus this is a closure-finite characteristic-cell decomposition.
Put the radius- circle tangent at the origin with centre , and choose its far point . The set meets every closed cell in a closed set, but it is not closed in the Hawaiian earring since . Hence the topology is not the weak topology on these closed cells, so this decomposition is not a CW complex.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Chapter 0 (standard reference, not scraped)