How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The closure of a CW cell need not be a closed ball
Statement refuted
Every closed cell in a CW complex is homeomorphic to a closed ball.
Counterexample
Given: Attach one -cell to one -cell by sending both points of to that vertex.
Proof technique: direct.
Its open cell is still the embedded open interval by The interior of an attached cell embeds openly in its closure, but is not homeomorphic to ; this refutes the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Chapter 0 (standard reference, not scraped)