How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A degenerate pullback metric under a constant map
Statement refuted
A constant smooth map always pulls a Riemannian metric back to a Riemannian metric.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is constant, is a smooth manifold of dimension , and the target metric is .
Pullback of a riemannian metric as a tensor: For smooth and a Riemannian metric on , its pullback tensor is . This is def-pullback-of-a-covariant-tensor-field for the tensor in def-riemannian-metric-and-riemannian-manifold. It is always symmetric and positive semidefinite; the name does not assert positive definiteness. Smoothness and the precise immersion criterion are established next.
Pullback of a riemannian metric is riemannian exactly for immersions: is Riemannian if and only if is an immersion. In general it is positive semidefinite, with radical at .
Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts: A smooth -manifold is a pair in which is a topological -manifold (def-topological-manifold-without-boundary) and is a smooth structure on : a maximal smooth atlas (thm-each-smooth-atlas-is-contained-in-a-unique-maximal-smooth-atlas). Because thm-each-smooth-atlas-is-contained-in-a-unique-maximal-smooth-atlas sends every smooth atlas to the unique maximal atlas containing it, a smooth manifold is equivalently specified by a topological manifold together with any one smooth atlas , the structure being the generated . A chart is called a smooth chart (or a chart of the smooth structure); its domain is a coordinate domain and its coordinate functions are smooth coordinates on . When the structure is clear from context, the manifold itself is written in place of .
Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces: Let . For , put with its usual topology; for put , the one-point space. A topological -manifold without boundary (or briefly an -manifold) is a topological space satisfying: 1. is Hausdorff (def-hausdorff-space); 2. is second countable (def-second-countable-space); 3. is locally Euclidean of dimension : every has an open neighbourhood homeomorphic to an open subset of (def-homeomorphism-and-open-maps). The empty space satisfies all three conditions vacuously, so is an -manifold for every ; this degenerate instance is kept, and statements about nonempty manifolds name the hypothesis. In dimension zero, condition 3 forces the one-point neighbourhoods of points to be open singletons, so a -manifold is exactly a discrete second-countable space with at most countably many points.
Counterexample
In each coordinate chart, the component of is constant, so its differential is zero. The pullback formula gives for all tangent vectors at every point. Thus the pullback is the zero smooth tensor.
If is nonempty, fix a point and a chart there. Its first coordinate tangent vector is nonzero because . The zero tensor has quadratic value zero on that vector and is not positive definite, so is not Riemannian. Equivalently is not injective on the positive-dimensional tangent space. In particular and provide an explicit counterexample: .
If is empty, its unique tensor is smooth and the requirement of positive definiteness at every point has no instances, so the pullback is vacuously Riemannian. Together with step 2.1, this shows that for the stated positive dimension it is not Riemannian exactly when is nonempty. The counterexample uses the nonempty real line, so the empty case does not rescue the universal assertion.
Source locator
Lee, pp. 330–331, pullback metrics and Proposition 13.9; the empty-manifold convention is that of the cited library definitions.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)