Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A degenerate pullback metric under a constant map

Statement refuted

A constant smooth map always pulls a Riemannian metric back to a Riemannian metric.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F:MR is constant, M is a smooth manifold of dimension n>0, and the target metric is dy2.

[F1]

Pullback of a riemannian metric as a tensor: For smooth F:MN and a Riemannian metric h on N, its pullback tensor is (Fh)p(v,w)=hF(p)(dFpv,dFpw). This is def-pullback-of-a-covariant-tensor-field for the tensor in def-riemannian-metric-and-riemannian-manifold. It is always symmetric and positive semidefinite; the name does not assert positive definiteness. Smoothness and the precise immersion criterion are established next.

[F2]

Pullback of a riemannian metric is riemannian exactly for immersions: Fh is Riemannian if and only if F is an immersion. In general it is positive semidefinite, with radical kerdFp at p.

[F3]

Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts: A smooth n-manifold is a pair (M,S) in which M is a topological n-manifold (def-topological-manifold-without-boundary) and S is a smooth structure on M: a maximal smooth atlas (thm-each-smooth-atlas-is-contained-in-a-unique-maximal-smooth-atlas). Because thm-each-smooth-atlas-is-contained-in-a-unique-maximal-smooth-atlas sends every smooth atlas to the unique maximal atlas containing it, a smooth manifold is equivalently specified by a topological manifold M together with any one smooth atlas A, the structure being the generated [A]. A chart (U,φ)S is called a smooth chart (or a chart of the smooth structure); its domain is a coordinate domain and its coordinate functions are smooth coordinates on U. When the structure is clear from context, the manifold itself is written M in place of (M,S).

[F4]

Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces: Let nN. For n1, put Rn:=k<nR with its usual topology; for n=0 put R0:={0}, the one-point space. A topological n-manifold without boundary (or briefly an n-manifold) is a topological space M satisfying: 1. M is Hausdorff (def-hausdorff-space); 2. M is second countable (def-second-countable-space); 3. M is locally Euclidean of dimension n: every pM has an open neighbourhood UM homeomorphic to an open subset of Rn (def-homeomorphism-and-open-maps). The empty space satisfies all three conditions vacuously, so M= is an n-manifold for every n; this degenerate instance is kept, and statements about nonempty manifolds name the hypothesis. In dimension zero, condition 3 forces the one-point neighbourhoods of points to be open singletons, so a 0-manifold is exactly a discrete second-countable space with at most countably many points.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

In each coordinate chart, the component of F is constant, so its differential is zero. The pullback formula gives (Fdy2)p(v,w)=dyF(p)2(0,0)=0 for all tangent vectors at every point. Thus the pullback is the zero smooth tensor.

F1given
2.1

If M is nonempty, fix a point p and a chart there. Its first coordinate tangent vector is nonzero because n>0. The zero tensor has quadratic value zero on that vector and is not positive definite, so is not Riemannian. Equivalently dFp=0 is not injective on the positive-dimensional tangent space. In particular M=R and F(x)=0 provide an explicit counterexample: (Fdy2)0(x,x)=0.

F2F3F4step 1.1
3.1

If M is empty, its unique tensor is smooth and the requirement of positive definiteness at every point has no instances, so the pullback is vacuously Riemannian. Together with step 2.1, this shows that for the stated positive dimension it is not Riemannian exactly when M is nonempty. The counterexample uses the nonempty real line, so the empty case does not rescue the universal assertion.

F3F4step 1.1step 2.1

Source locator

Lee, pp. 330–331, pullback metrics and Proposition 13.9; the empty-manifold convention is that of the cited library definitions.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources