How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integration of Forms and the General Stokes Theorem
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The worked metrics include Euclidean space, the round sphere, products, conformal planes, upper half-space, and a torus defined by periodic charts. Each construction checks positivity and displays its coefficients. Further calculations give circle distance, cross-component infinity, polar volume and divergence, and the full Hodge-star table in three dimensions. The constant-map counterexample also records the empty-source convention.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The euclidean metric and its musical maps
Example
On Euclidean , , , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and .
Coordinate criterion for a riemannian metric: A tensor is Riemannian exactly when its coordinate matrix has smooth entries and is symmetric positive definite. Under it transforms by .
The musical maps are smooth inverse bundle isomorphisms: and are smooth inverse bundle isomorphisms.
The gradient is characterized by inner products: The gradient is the unique smooth vector field satisfying for every smooth vector field .
Musical isomorphisms: The musical maps are defined by and by for every tangent vector .
Verification
The matrix of is , which is smooth, symmetric, and has for . For every basis vector , F4 gives , hence . If , then F4 gives , hence . Substitution in either order returns the original coefficients, as also required by F2.
Since , the inner-product characterization gives . In particular has and .
Source locator
Lee, Example 13.1, p.328; musical isomorphisms and gradient, p.342. The quadratic-function instance is calculated above.
The round metric on the sphere as an induced metric
Example
The Euclidean inclusion of induces its round metric. In spherical coordinates on , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and its usual smooth structure; is inclusion.
Pullback of a riemannian metric is riemannian exactly for immersions: is Riemannian if and only if is an immersion. In general it is positive semidefinite, with radical at .
Coordinate criterion for a riemannian metric: A tensor is Riemannian exactly when its coordinate matrix has smooth entries and is symmetric positive definite. Under it transforms by .
Verification
A tangent vector to satisfies by differentiating . The inclusion differential sends this vector to the identical Euclidean vector, so is injective. Hence is Riemannian, and its value is .
For , one has and . Their dot products are , , and , respectively. Thus the coordinate matrix is on and an angular interval of length less than .
At either pole the spherical parametrization is not a chart, since . The intrinsic quadratic form remains on every nonzero tangent vector by step 1.1; the vanishing coordinate coefficient at a pole therefore does not signify tensor degeneracy.
Source locator
Lee, Proposition 13.9, p.331, and Example 13.16, p.333, round metric. The spherical-coordinate dot products are displayed above.
The product riemannian metric
Example
The product metric on is , with block matrix .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Finite-dimensional smooth Riemannian manifolds , with their product smooth structure.
Coordinate criterion for a riemannian metric: A tensor is Riemannian exactly when its coordinate matrix has smooth entries and is symmetric positive definite. Under it transforms by .
Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure: Let and be smooth manifolds of dimensions and . Then with the product topology is a topological -manifold. If and are smooth atlases with and , then the set of product charts is a smooth atlas on , and the maximal atlas it generates is independent of the presenting atlases: it depends only on and . This maximal atlas is the product smooth structure of .
Verification
In product coordinates a tangent vector is , and the projection differentials send it to and . Thus the sum of pullbacks evaluates on two vectors as , and has the stated block diagonal matrix. The product charts are smooth, and each coefficient is a smooth coefficient of or composed with a projection.
For at least one vector is nonzero. The sum is therefore strictly positive, since each summand is nonnegative and the corresponding nonzero summand is positive. Symmetry holds term by term, so the coordinate criterion proves this is Riemannian. For the concrete product of two Euclidean lines the matrix is and the squared norm of is .
Source locator
Lee, Example 13.2 and equation (13.1), p.329, product metrics.
A conformal metric on the plane
Example
For on , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
Conformal equivalence of riemannian metrics: Two Riemannian metrics are conformally equivalent if for a smooth real function on . The positive smooth factor preserves the metric condition of def-riemannian-metric-and-riemannian-manifold. Equivalently for smooth , since . Reflexivity uses , reversal uses , and composing rescalings adds their functions.
Riemannian gradient: For a smooth real function , its Riemannian gradient is . prop-exterior-derivative-of-a-function-is-its-differential identifies . The smooth bundle isomorphism in thm-the-musical-maps-are-smooth-inverse-bundle-isomorphisms therefore makes the gradient a smooth vector field. In coordinates . Constants, and all functions in dimension zero, have zero gradient.
Riemannian volume density: The Riemannian volume density is in coordinates. The matrix is that of prop-coordinate-criterion-for-a-riemannian-metric, so its determinant is positive and smooth. The density frames and their absolute-Jacobian law are def-density-bundle-and-smooth-density. In dimension zero take the empty determinant to be one, giving weight one at every point, independently of orientation. The compatibility of these local formulas is proved in lem-the-riemannian-volume-density-is-coordinate-independent.
Verification
The factor is smooth and strictly positive. The matrix is , its inverse is , and for , so this is the stated conformal metric.
Put . For every , , so is the gradient. Since , its positive square root is , giving the asserted density.
For the explicit instance and , these formulas yield , , and . At the gradient is and the density coefficient is .
Source locator
Lee, p.328, coordinate metric criterion; p.342, gradient characterization; Proposition 15.31, p.390, coordinate volume coefficient. The conformal instance and its determinant are derived above.
The hyperbolic upper half space metric
Example
For , on the metric has density .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The upper half-space with its Euclidean open-subset smooth structure.
Coordinate criterion for a riemannian metric: A tensor is Riemannian exactly when its coordinate matrix has smooth entries and is symmetric positive definite. Under it transforms by .
Riemannian volume density: The Riemannian volume density is in coordinates. The matrix is that of prop-coordinate-criterion-for-a-riemannian-metric, so its determinant is positive and smooth. The density frames and their absolute-Jacobian law are def-density-bundle-and-smooth-density. In dimension zero take the empty determinant to be one, giving weight one at every point, independently of orientation. The compatibility of these local formulas is proved in lem-the-riemannian-volume-density-is-coordinate-independent.
Verification
For , is smooth and positive. Hence is a smooth symmetric positive-definite matrix, since when . It defines a Riemannian metric.
Its determinant is and the positive square root is . The density definition therefore gives the asserted formula. At the matrix is and the density coefficient is .
Source locator
Lee, p.328, coordinate positive-definiteness criterion; Proposition 15.31, p.390, volume coefficient; pp.430–431, Riemannian density. The upper-half-space coefficients are computed above; no curvature or completeness statement is asserted.
The flat torus metric from periodic euclidean coordinates
Example
The periodic Euclidean coordinates on define a metric locally equal to , called the flat torus metric.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The integer translation action on and quotient map .
Coordinate criterion for a riemannian metric: A tensor is Riemannian exactly when its coordinate matrix has smooth entries and is symmetric positive definite. Under it transforms by .
Verification
The map is open since is open when is. Its restriction to a box of side lengths less than is injective and hence a homeomorphism onto its open image. On overlap components the inverse charts differ by a constant integer translation. These smooth maps have derivative .
For two distinct orbits represented by , their displacement vectors never vanish. Only finitely many have , because every coordinate of such an integer vector is bounded. Taking the minimum of and these finitely many positive lengths gives . Images of radius- balls around are disjoint, proving Hausdorffness. The images of rational boxes form a countable basis. Thus the charts in step 1.1 define a smooth manifold.
Since all transition derivatives are , the local tensors agree on overlaps. They glue to a smooth tensor with positive-definite identity matrix in every quotient chart. The coordinate criterion proves it is Riemannian. For example in dimension two the local vector has squared norm , independent of the integer translate chosen for the chart. Local equality to the Euclidean metric is the flatness meant here.
Source locator
Lee, p.332, definition of flatness as local Euclidean isometry and Theorem 13.14(b). The particular torus quotient atlas and metric descent are proved above.
Length and distance on the circle
Example
On the unit circle with induced metric, . Antipodes have two distinct minimizing semicircles.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Real angles , and the circle parametrization .
Riemannian speed and length: The Riemannian speed on a piece is . Its length is . The curve convention is def-piecewise-c-one-curve-on-a-manifold and the norm is def-pointwise-norm-and-angle-from-a-riemannian-metric. Each integrand is continuous on its closed piece with the one-sided endpoint derivative, hence Riemann integrable and nonnegative. Values chosen at the finitely many corners do not change its integral. For a singleton interval the empty sum is zero; a constant curve also has zero length. Partition independence is established next.
Riemannian distance on a connected manifold: On a connected Riemannian manifold define . Lengths are those of def-riemannian-speed-and-length. For each pair , lem-any-two-points-in-a-connected-smooth-manifold-can-be-joined-by-a-piecewise-c-one-curve supplies a curve, so the set of lengths is nonempty, contains a finite real number and is bounded below by zero. Applying the least-upper-bound property cor-cauchy-reals-lub-complete to the negatives gives a finite nonnegative infimum. On the empty connected manifold this defines the empty distance function; there are no pairs to evaluate. No minimizing curve is part of this definition.
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: Let . Suppose is continuous on and differentiable on . If is Riemann integrable and then No derivative of at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension do not enter the conclusion.
Verification
For any piecewise circle path, the inverse images of smooth angle arcs form an open cover of its compact parameter interval. A finite subcover has a positive Lebesgue number; subdividing more finely than it, and at the original differentiability breakpoints, puts each piece in one angle arc. Start the first angle at , and add a multiple of to each successive local angle to match the preceding endpoint. This yields a continuous piecewise lift starting at , ending at for some integer .
Differentiation of gives squared speed . Consequently , where Newton–Leibniz is applied on each closed smooth piece and the endpoint increments telescope.
There is an integer with , obtained by rounding to a nearest integer. Every other representative has absolute value at least . The path on has constant speed and attains that lower bound, proving the distance formula.
For , the representatives and both minimize. The paths and have length and disjoint interior semicircle images. For equal endpoints , the same construction is a constant path of length zero.
Source locator
Lee, pp. 331 and 337–338, induced metric and distance; the finite angle lift and minimization over integers are proved above.
A riemannian distance with no cross component finite value
Example
On with metric on each component, and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two disjoint Euclidean lines with their disjoint-union smooth structure.
Extended riemannian distance on a disconnected manifold: The extended Riemannian distance on arbitrary is the componentwise Riemannian distance when two points are in the same component, and otherwise. Within each component use thm-riemannian-distance-is-a-metric. Components are open, since small coordinate balls are connected. A continuous curve cannot meet two components because its connected interval image is connected, so the cross-component curve family is empty, with . This is an extended metric: if two endpoints are in different components, any third point is in a different component from at least one of them, so the triangle inequality has infinite right side. It is a finite metric precisely when there are no distinct components. Empty and singleton manifolds retain their unique distances.
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: Let . Suppose is continuous on and differentiable on . If is Riemann integrable and then No derivative of at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension do not enter the conclusion.
Verification
The two lines are disjoint open-and-closed components; their usual charts give a Hausdorff second-countable smooth one-manifold and metric coefficient . A continuous path cannot meet both components, because their inverse images would separate its connected interval. Hence the cross-component admissible family is empty and its length infimum is . In particular .
Within a component, an admissible path has length , by Newton–Leibniz on its finitely many smooth pieces. The path for attains this bound. The same-component infimum is therefore ; for example .
Source locator
Lee, pp. 337–338, connected distance and Euclidean calculation; cross-component infinity follows from the declared extended-distance convention.
Volume density in polar coordinates
Example
In a polar chart of the Euclidean plane, the density is and the positive-oriented volume form is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , with and in an open interval of length less than .
Riemannian volume density: The Riemannian volume density is in coordinates. The matrix is that of prop-coordinate-criterion-for-a-riemannian-metric, so its determinant is positive and smooth. The density frames and their absolute-Jacobian law are def-density-bundle-and-smooth-density. In dimension zero take the empty determinant to be one, giving weight one at every point, independently of orientation. The compatibility of these local formulas is proved in lem-the-riemannian-volume-density-is-coordinate-independent.
The riemannian volume density is coordinate independent: The local Riemannian volume densities glue to a positive smooth density independent of coordinates.
Verification
Differentiation gives and . Expanding , the mixed terms cancel and the diagonal terms sum to . Thus , whose positive square root is on this domain, and the density is .
The wedge expansion gives . The Jacobian is positive, so the chart has the standard orientation and this is its positive volume form. The absolute Jacobian density law agrees with step 1.1. At , both coordinate coefficients are . The excluded value is a failure of polar coordinates, not a zero of the Euclidean density.
Source locator
Lee, Example 13.12, p.332, polar metric; Proposition 15.31, p.390, coordinate volume formula; pp.430–431, Riemannian density.
Hodge star on euclidean three space
Example
In standard oriented Euclidean , , , , , and in every degree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The orthonormal coframe with volume .
Hodge star is a smooth bundle isomorphism: The Hodge star exists uniquely and is a smooth bundle isomorphism in every degree .
Hodge star squared sign: On real -forms, .
Verification
The complementary-wedge formula gives . For the one-forms, , , and : the latter two permutations each have two transpositions. These complementary two-forms wedge to zero with either of the other one-form basis vectors because of a repeated factor. Thus they satisfy all pairings in the defining identity and are the displayed stars.
Similarly , , and . Distinct two-form basis vectors have zero pairing and wedge to zero with the listed complementary one-form. Consequently , , , and . For example by linearity.
For , the exponent is respectively , always even. The star-square formula therefore gives in all these degrees, in agreement with the table.
Source locator
Lee, Problem 16-18(a–e), pp. 437–438, and Problem 16-19, p. 438, Euclidean Hodge-star computations.
Divergence in polar coordinates
Example
For the Euclidean metric in polar coordinates, .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A polar chart with , metric matrix , and a smooth vector field .
Coordinate formula for riemannian divergence: In coordinates, .
Verification
The positive square root of the metric determinant is . Substituting into the divergence formula gives . Since , the second term is , proving the formula.
The orthonormal polar frame is , . Thus if , its coordinate components are , , and the formula becomes . For , it gives . For it gives .
Source locator
Lee, p.423, definition of divergence and Exercise 16.31; Example 13.12, p.332, polar metric. The coordinate divergence theorem declared as F1 supplies the local coefficient formula used above.
A degenerate pullback metric under a constant map
Statement refuted
A constant smooth map always pulls a Riemannian metric back to a Riemannian metric.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is constant, is a smooth manifold of dimension , and the target metric is .
Pullback of a riemannian metric as a tensor: For smooth and a Riemannian metric on , its pullback tensor is . This is def-pullback-of-a-covariant-tensor-field for the tensor in def-riemannian-metric-and-riemannian-manifold. It is always symmetric and positive semidefinite; the name does not assert positive definiteness. Smoothness and the precise immersion criterion are established next.
Pullback of a riemannian metric is riemannian exactly for immersions: is Riemannian if and only if is an immersion. In general it is positive semidefinite, with radical at .
Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts: A smooth -manifold is a pair in which is a topological -manifold (def-topological-manifold-without-boundary) and is a smooth structure on : a maximal smooth atlas (thm-each-smooth-atlas-is-contained-in-a-unique-maximal-smooth-atlas). Because thm-each-smooth-atlas-is-contained-in-a-unique-maximal-smooth-atlas sends every smooth atlas to the unique maximal atlas containing it, a smooth manifold is equivalently specified by a topological manifold together with any one smooth atlas , the structure being the generated . A chart is called a smooth chart (or a chart of the smooth structure); its domain is a coordinate domain and its coordinate functions are smooth coordinates on . When the structure is clear from context, the manifold itself is written in place of .
Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces: Let . For , put with its usual topology; for put , the one-point space. A topological -manifold without boundary (or briefly an -manifold) is a topological space satisfying: 1. is Hausdorff (def-hausdorff-space); 2. is second countable (def-second-countable-space); 3. is locally Euclidean of dimension : every has an open neighbourhood homeomorphic to an open subset of (def-homeomorphism-and-open-maps). The empty space satisfies all three conditions vacuously, so is an -manifold for every ; this degenerate instance is kept, and statements about nonempty manifolds name the hypothesis. In dimension zero, condition 3 forces the one-point neighbourhoods of points to be open singletons, so a -manifold is exactly a discrete second-countable space with at most countably many points.
Counterexample
In each coordinate chart, the component of is constant, so its differential is zero. The pullback formula gives for all tangent vectors at every point. Thus the pullback is the zero smooth tensor.
If is nonempty, fix a point and a chart there. Its first coordinate tangent vector is nonzero because . The zero tensor has quadratic value zero on that vector and is not positive definite, so is not Riemannian. Equivalently is not injective on the positive-dimensional tangent space. In particular and provide an explicit counterexample: .
If is empty, its unique tensor is smooth and the requirement of positive definiteness at every point has no instances, so the pullback is vacuously Riemannian. Together with step 2.1, this shows that for the stated positive dimension it is not Riemannian exactly when is nonempty. The counterexample uses the nonempty real line, so the empty case does not rescue the universal assertion.
Source locator
Lee, pp. 330–331, pullback metrics and Proposition 13.9; the empty-manifold convention is that of the cited library definitions.