Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The musical maps are smooth inverse bundle isomorphisms

Statement

:TMTM and :TMTM are smooth inverse bundle isomorphisms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Riemannian metric with coordinate matrix G.

[F1]

Musical isomorphisms: The musical maps for g are v=g(v,) and its pointwise inverse α, characterized by g(α,v)=α(v) for all v. For the metric in def-riemannian-metric-and-riemannian-manifold, v=0 forces g(v,v)=0 and hence v=0. Thus is injective between equal-dimensional fibres and bijective; this gives the pointwise inverse. Smooth inverse bundle maps are proved in thm-the-musical-maps-are-smooth-inverse-bundle-isomorphisms. On a zero fibre both are the unique map.

[F2]

Coordinate criterion for a riemannian metric: A tensor g=i,jgijdxidxj is Riemannian exactly when its coordinate matrix G=(gij) has smooth entries and is symmetric positive definite. Under J=x/y it transforms by Gy=JTGxJ.

[F3]

Smoothness of a bundle map is equivalent to smooth local matrices: Let Φ:EF be a fibrewise linear map over a smooth base map f:MN. Choose local frames (e1,,er) for E on UM and (u1,,us) for F on VN with f(U)V. Then Φ is smooth on EU if and only if there are smooth scalar functions aji:UR such that Φ(ei(p))=j=1saji(p)uj(f(p)) for every pU.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The coordinate formula for is vGv. Positive definiteness makes G invertible; its inverse has entries G1=adj(G)/detG, smooth because detG>0. Thus both fibre maps have smooth matrices and are smooth bundle maps.

F1F2F3given
2.1

The matrix identities G1G=I and GG1=I give (v)=v and (α)=α. Their pointwise characterizations are intrinsic, so coordinate formulas agree on overlaps. Rank zero has the unique mutually inverse maps, and empty base has empty bundle maps.

F1step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Chapter 13, pp.328–332 and 341–342.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Musical isomorphisms.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources