How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A distribution function need not have a density
Statement refuted
A distribution function need not arise from a Lebesgue density.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Bernoulli random variable with and , where .
The cumulative distribution function is (Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable).
Atoms of a law are positive point masses (Atoms and continuity points of a law).
Counterexample
The CDF of is So the law has atoms at and by [L2].
If this law were given by a Lebesgue density , then every singleton would have probability In particular , contradicting .
Therefore this distribution function has no Lebesgue density.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. R. Norris, Probability and Measure, Section 2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)