Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A distribution function need not have a density

Statement refuted

A distribution function need not arise from a Lebesgue density.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Bernoulli random variable X with P(X=1)=p and P(X=0)=1p, where 0<p<1.

[L1]

The cumulative distribution function is FX(x)=P(Xx) (Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable).

[L2]

Atoms of a law are positive point masses (Atoms and continuity points of a law).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The CDF of X is FX(x)={0,x<0,1p,0x<1,1,x1. So the law has atoms at 0 and 1 by [L2].

L1L2given
2.1

If this law were given by a Lebesgue density f, then every singleton would have probability {a}f(x)dx=0. In particular P(X=0)=0, contradicting P(X=0)=1p>0.

step 1.1givenalgebra
3.1

Therefore this distribution function has no Lebesgue density.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources