How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A normalised cube indicator is not an atom
Statement refuted
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). The claim refuted is that the support and size conditions alone characterise -atoms, in particular that the normalised cube indicator is an atom. Let be a nondegenerate axis-parallel cube and put . Then and pointwise, so satisfies the support and size conditions of a -atom ( atoms with a prescribed moment order); but , so the zeroth-moment condition fails and is not an atom. This refutes only the atom property; it does not by itself prove , which is the separate and stronger counterexample on this page and requires the vanishing-moment corollary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and , a nondegenerate closed axis-parallel cube with volume in the sense of Axis-parallel rectangles in and their volume, and the function .
A -atom is a measurable with , almost everywhere, and ( atoms with a prescribed moment order).
and (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, Axis-parallel rectangles in and their volume); is the quotient by almost-everywhere null functions (The space as the quotient by null functions).
Counterexample
The witness is the pair with .
The support and size conditions hold. Since vanishes off , , and pointwise.
The moment condition fails. By [F1], , which is nonzero because . Hence the zeroth-moment requirement of [L1] fails, and is not a -atom.
Conclusion. The function meets the support and size parts of the atom definition but not the cancellation part; therefore the support and size conditions alone do not suffice for the atom property, and the moment condition is a genuine part of atoms with a prescribed moment order.
Depends on
- $H^p$ atoms with a prescribed moment order
- Axis-parallel rectangles in $\mathbb{R}^m$ and their volume
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stefano Meda, Peter Sjogren, Maria Vallarino, Atomic decompositions and operators on Hardy spaces, Revista de la Union Matematica Argentina 50 (2009), no. 2, 15-22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Li-An Daniel Wang, Multiplier Theorems on Anisotropic Hardy Spaces (PhD dissertation, University of Oregon, 2012) (standard reference, not scraped)