Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A normalised cube indicator is not an H1 atom

Statement refuted

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). The claim refuted is that the support and L∞ size conditions alone characterise (1,∞,0)-atoms, in particular that the normalised cube indicator is an atom. Let Q⊆Rn be a nondegenerate axis-parallel cube and put a=∣Q∣−11Q. Then supp⁡a⊆Q and ∣a∣=∣Q∣−11Q≤∣Q∣−1 pointwise, so a satisfies the support and size conditions of a (1,∞,0)-atom (Hp atoms with a prescribed moment order); but ∫Rna=∣Q∣−1∣Q∣=1≠0, so the zeroth-moment condition fails and a is not an atom. This refutes only the atom property; it does not by itself prove ∣Q∣−11Q∉H1, which is the separate and stronger counterexample on this page and requires the vanishing-moment corollary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and n≥1, a nondegenerate closed axis-parallel cube Q with volume ∣Q∣ in the sense of Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume, and the function a=∣Q∣−11Q.

[L1]

A (1,∞,0)-atom is a measurable a with supp⁡a⊆Q, ∣a∣≤∣Q∣−1 almost everywhere, and ∫Rna=0 (Hp atoms with a prescribed moment order).

Counterexample

The witness is the pair (Q,a) with a=∣Q∣−11Q.

1.1L1given

The support and size conditions hold. Since 1Q vanishes off Q, supp⁡a⊆Q, and ∣a∣=∣Q∣−11Q≤∣Q∣−1 pointwise.

1.2L1F1algebra

The moment condition fails. By [F1], ∫Rna=∣Q∣−1∫1Q=∣Q∣−1∣Q∣=1, which is nonzero because ∣Q∣>0. Hence the zeroth-moment requirement ∫a=0 of [L1] fails, and a is not a (1,∞,0)-atom.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Conclusion. The function a meets the support and size parts of the atom definition but not the cancellation part; therefore the support and size conditions alone do not suffice for the atom property, and the moment condition is a genuine part of Hp atoms with a prescribed moment order.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources