Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-dimensional irreducible real representation of an abelian Lie algebra

Counterexample

Let g=Rt be the one-dimensional abelian real Lie algebra. On V=R2, let t act by

J=(0110).

This is an irreducible two-dimensional real representation of the abelian Lie algebra g.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed real vector spaces and the linear map ρ(at)=aJ.

[L1]

A representation is a linear map satisfying ρ([x,y])=[ρ(x),ρ(y)] (Representations of Lie algebras).

[L2]

A nonzero representation is irreducible when its only stable subspaces are 0 and the whole space (Irreducible, completely reducible, and faithful representations).

Refutation

technique · counterexample
1.1

The map ρ is real-linear. Since g is abelian, [at,bt]=0, and since scalar multiples of J commute, [aJ,bJ]=0. Hence ρ([at,bt])=[ρ(at),ρ(bt)] for all a,bR, so [L1] makes V a representation.

L1givenalgebra
1.2

Suppose W were a nonzero proper g-stable subspace of V. As V has dimension two, W=Rv for some v0. Stability gives Jv=λv for a real scalar λ. But J2=I, so v=J2v=λ2v, forcing λ2=1, impossible over R. Thus no such W exists, and [L2] shows that V is irreducible.

L2givenalgebra
2.1

The acting Lie algebra is abelian and the verified irreducible module has real dimension two, so it is the required counterexample to any one-dimensional conclusion over R. Over C, the same matrix acquires eigenlines for the eigenvalues i and i, pinpointing the missing field hypothesis. The finite calculation uses no choice principle.

step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources