Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-dimensional irreducible real representation of an abelian Lie algebra

Counterexample

Let g=Rt be the one-dimensional abelian real Lie algebra. On V=R2, let t act by

J=(0−110).

This is an irreducible two-dimensional real representation of the abelian Lie algebra g.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed real vector spaces and the linear map ρ(at)=aJ.

[L1]

A representation is a linear map satisfying ρ([x,y])=[ρ(x),ρ(y)] (Representations of Lie algebras).

[L2]

A nonzero representation is irreducible when its only stable subspaces are 0 and the whole space (Irreducible, completely reducible, and faithful representations).

Refutation

technique · counterexample
1.1L1givenalgebra

The map ρ is real-linear. Since g is abelian, [at,bt]=0, and since scalar multiples of J commute, [aJ,bJ]=0. Hence ρ([at,bt])=[ρ(at),ρ(bt)] for all a,b∈R, so [L1] makes V a representation.

1.2L2givenalgebra

Suppose W were a nonzero proper g-stable subspace of V. As V has dimension two, W=Rv for some v≠0. Stability gives Jv=λv for a real scalar λ. But J2=−I, so −v=J2v=λ2v, forcing λ2=−1, impossible over R. Thus no such W exists, and [L2] shows that V is irreducible.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The acting Lie algebra is abelian and the verified irreducible module has real dimension two, so it is the required counterexample to any one-dimensional conclusion over R. Over C, the same matrix acquires eigenlines for the eigenvalues i and −i, pinpointing the missing field hypothesis. The finite calculation uses no choice principle.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources