How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Irreducible, completely reducible, and faithful representations
Definition
A nonzero representation is irreducible if its only stable linear subspaces are and .
A representation is completely reducible if it is isomorphic, as a representation, to an algebraic direct sum
of irreducible representations, where elements have finite support. This is a definition, not an assertion that every representation has such a decomposition. The zero representation is the empty direct sum and is therefore completely reducible under this convention.
A representation is faithful if is injective.
Depends on
Used by
- Every finite-dimensional module is a direct sum of highest-weight modules Corollary
- Irreducible representations of solvable complex Lie algebras are one-dimensional Corollary
- Schur’s lemma for irreducible Lie-algebra representations Corollary
- A two-dimensional irreducible real representation of an abelian Lie algebra Counterexample
- Positive-characteristic failure of Lie's theorem Counterexample
- A nonsplit two-dimensional representation Example
- All irreducible finite-dimensional sl2 modules Example
- Clebsch–Gordan decomposition for sl2 Example
- Exterior powers and fundamental weights of slₙ Example
- Standard and dual representations of slₙ Example
- Symmetric powers as highest-weight modules Example
- A tensor-product top weight does not determine all constituents False statement
- Every irreducible real representation of a solvable Lie algebra is one-dimensional False statement
- Finite-dimensionality requires dominance integrality False statement
- Lie-algebra representations need not be completely reducible False statement
- Every finite-dimensional irreducible module has a highest-weight vector Lemma
- Unique simple quotient of the dominant cyclic module Lemma
- An irreducible module is generated by its highest-weight vector Proposition
- Highest weight of the dual representation Proposition
- Representation kernels are ideals Proposition
- Dominant simple highest-weight modules are finite-dimensional Theorem
- Equivalent characterizations of reductive Lie algebras Theorem
- Finite-dimensional representations of sl₂ Theorem
- Highest-weight classification Theorem
- Schur-Weyl decomposition and highest weights Theorem
- Simple highest-weight modules are classified by highest weight Theorem
- Weyl's complete reducibility theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, MIT 18.745 notes, §11.1, printed pp. 61–62 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kirillov, An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, §4.3, printed pp. 52–53 (standard reference, not scraped)