How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An acyclic noncontractible cone
Statement refuted
Every acyclic mapping cone is contractible.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The zero map from the three-term complex to the zero complex.
A contractible complex is one whose identity map is null-homotopic (A contractible complex).
The cone of the zero map is the direct sum with a shift (The cone of the zero map is the direct sum with a shift).
Shift preserves contractibility and quasi-isomorphism status (Shift preserves homotopy equivalences, contractibility, and quasi-isomorphisms).
A quasi-isomorphism is a chain map inducing isomorphisms on all homology objects (Quasi-isomorphism).
Counterexample
The displayed source complex is acyclic: multiplication by is injective, reduction modulo is surjective, and its kernel is , the image of the first map. If it were contractible, [L1] would make its identity null-homotopic; in degree that would supply a section of the quotient map , which is impossible. Thus the source complex is acyclic and noncontractible.
By [L2], the cone of the displayed zero map is the shift of the source complex. Because the zero map from an acyclic complex to the zero complex induces isomorphisms on all homology groups, [L4] makes that map a quasi-isomorphism; then [L3] makes its shift a quasi-isomorphism too. Hence the cone is acyclic. If the cone were contractible, applying [L3] with shift would make the source complex contractible, contradicting step 1.1. Thus this cone is acyclic and noncontractible, so it refutes the displayed statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)