Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded measurable coefficients do not give Schauder estimates

Statement refuted

The assertion that uniform ellipticity with merely bounded (even bounded continuous) principal coefficients suffices for a C2,α conclusion for classical C2 solutions of Lu=f is false; the counterexample below exhibits a bounded continuous uniformly elliptic L, a classical C2 solution of Lu=1, and a coefficient that fails to make D2u α-Hölder for any exponent larger than the coefficient modulus. This does not contradict the interior Schauder theorem of this page, which assumes C0,α principal coefficients.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥2, 0<β<α<1, the unit ball B1(0)⊆Rn, the diagonal matrix field A(x)=diag⁡(1+∣x1∣β,1,…,1), and the function u(x)=∫0x1x1−s1+∣s∣β ds.

[A1]

The only choice assumption is Countable Choice ACω; no full Axiom of Choice is used. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Uniform ellipticity and the nondivergence operator were fixed in Uniformly elliptic nondivergence-form operators and their frozen coefficients: L=Aij∂i∂j is uniformly elliptic with constants λ,Λ when the symmetric matrix field satisfies λ∣ξ∣2≤Aij(x)ξiξj≤Λ∣ξ∣2. The Hölder classes and their seminorms are those of Hölder spaces Ck,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and Ck,α domains. Coordinates xi and partials ∂i use the operator's one-based relabelling of coordinate i−1 and ∂i−1 in Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space; multi-index derivatives retain that dependency's canonical order.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

The coefficient field. For x∈B1(0) the matrix A(x)=diag⁡(1+∣x1∣β,1,…,1) is symmetric with eigenvalues 1+∣x1∣β∈[1,2], so it is bounded, continuous and uniformly elliptic on B1(0) with λ=1, Λ=2; its off-diagonal entries vanish, and its C0,α seminorm on B1(0) is infinite because ∣x1∣β is not α-Hölder at 0 when α>β.

1.2F1givenalgebra

The solution. Since the integrand x1−s1+∣s∣β vanishes at s=x1, differentiating under the integral sign gives u′(x1)=∫0x1ds1+∣s∣β and u′′(x1)=11+∣x1∣β; both are continuous on R, so u∈C2, and u depends on x1 only. Hence Aij(x)∂i∂ju(x)=A11(x)u′′(x1)=(1+∣x1∣β)⋅11+∣x1∣β=1 for every x∈B1(0), that is Lu=1 with f≡1, which is as smooth as possible.

2.1step 1.2F1algebra

Failure of the Hölder estimate. For h→0 one has u′′(h)−u′′(0)=11+∣h∣β−1=−∣h∣β1+∣h∣β, so ∣u′′(h)−u′′(0)∣∣h∣α=∣h∣β−α1+∣h∣β→+∞ because β<α; hence [u′′]0,α;B1(0)=+∞ and u∉C2,α(B1(0)) for the given α∈(0,1).

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1A1given∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 give a uniformly elliptic nondivergence operator with bounded continuous (in particular bounded measurable) principal coefficients and a classical C2 solution of Lu=1 on B1(0) whose second derivative fails to be α-Hölder. Therefore bounded measurability of the coefficients does not force C2,α regularity; such a statement is false as stated, and the Hölder hypothesis on A in the interior Schauder estimate of this page is not a technical convenience. The example uses no divergence-form interpretation and no choice beyond [A1].

Remarks

  • The failure is driven by the coefficient's own modulus: A11−1=∣x1∣β is β-Hölder, and the solution inherits exactly that modulus in u′′; a C0,α coefficient with α>β would require u′′ to gain that Hölder regularity, which the example shows cannot be expected without the hypothesis.
  • The coefficient field here is continuous, so the example also refutes the stronger claim with "continuous" in place of "measurable"; its coefficient modulus is Dini and has vanishing mean oscillation as well. Those weaker hypotheses cannot force the particular C2,α conclusion refuted here; they may support different regularity conclusions.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources