How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
C^2 minus a complex line is a domain of holomorphy
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: removing a complex line from produces a domain that still cannot be a domain of holomorphy.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The domain .
A domain of holomorphy is tested by whether every holomorphic function extends through one fixed larger overlap (Holomorphic extension and domains of holomorphy in several variables).
Counterexample
The function is holomorphic on .
If extended holomorphically across any point of the missing hyperplane , then would extend holomorphically there as the constant function , forcing near that point and hence forcing a holomorphic function equal to at , which is impossible. So the missing complex line blocks extension, and is a domain of holomorphy rather than a Hartogs hole.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)