How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Holomorphic extension and domains of holomorphy in several variables
Definition
Let be domains with , and let be holomorphic (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of ).
A holomorphic function is a holomorphic extension of to when there is a nonempty open set such that on .
A domain is a domain of holomorphy when there do not exist domains with
such that every holomorphic admits a holomorphic extension satisfying on .
Remarks
This page uses the simultaneous-extension convention. To show that a domain is not a domain of holomorphy it is enough to find one fixed overlap from which every holomorphic function on extends to . The continuation is part of the datum for each function, but the witnessing pair is common.
Agreement propagates only on a common connected domain. If two holomorphic functions are both defined on one connected domain and agree on a nonempty open subset, the several-variable identity theorem forces agreement there. In the definition above, however, can be disconnected: agreement on one component need not imply agreement on another. The witnessing overlap is therefore part of the extension datum and cannot in general be changed arbitrarily.
Depends on
Used by
- A domain containing a Hartogs figure but not its hull is not a domain of holomorphy Corollary
- C² minus a complex line is a domain of holomorphy Counterexample
- The bidisc minus the origin is not a domain of holomorphy Example
- Local Hartogs extensions propagate along chains and glue uniquely Lemma
- A holomorphic function on a Hartogs figure extends to the full bidisc Theorem
- A locally bounded holomorphic function extends across a coordinate hyperplane Theorem
- Hartogs extension across a connected compact hole with a finite shell cover Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)