How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The bidisc minus the origin is not a domain of holomorphy
Example
The punctured bidisc
is not a domain of holomorphy.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The punctured bidisc .
A holomorphic function on a punctured several-variable domain extends across the missing point (An isolated puncture is removable in complex dimension at least two).
A domain of holomorphy is one for which no single larger overlap works for every holomorphic function (Holomorphic extension and domains of holomorphy in several variables).
Verification
Let . By [L1], extends holomorphically across the missing origin to the full bidisc. So the same larger domain works for every holomorphic function on .
The fixed overlap can be taken to be any small bidisc around a point of and the larger domain is the whole bidisc. By [L2], this shows that is not a domain of holomorphy.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, §§1.6, 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)