Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local Hartogs extensions propagate along chains and glue uniquely

Statement

Let ΩCm be open, let GΩ be a connected open set, and let U1,,UNΩ be domains with UjG for every j. Assume that for each j and every gO(UjG) there is EgO(Uj) satisfying Eg=g on all of UjG, and that after reordering every connected component of

Uj(GU1Uj1)(2jN).

meets G.

Then every holomorphic function on G extends uniquely to a holomorphic function on GU1UN.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A connected open set G, open sets U1,,UN, and the local extension property stated above.

[L1]

The local-extension hypothesis here explicitly requires agreement on the whole set UjG, which is stronger than agreement on one open overlap in the general extension convention (Holomorphic extension and domains of holomorphy in several variables).

[L2]

Coordinate shell neighborhoods are one class of open sets with the stated local extension property (Hartogs figures give local extension across polydisc shells).

[L3]

Holomorphic functions on a connected open set agree everywhere once they agree on one nonempty open subset (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let fO(G). By the explicit hypothesis for j=1, there is F1O(U1) with F1=f on all of U1G. Hence f and F1 glue to a holomorphic function on GU1.

L1given
2.1

Assume inductively that we have already obtained a holomorphic extension Fj1 on GU1Uj1. By hypothesis, the restriction of Fj1 to UjG extends holomorphically to some Ej on Uj. Let C be a connected component of Uj(GU1Uj1). The hypothesis makes CG nonempty, and since both C and G are open, CG is a nonempty open subset of C. On that open set, Ej and Fj1 both agree with f. Therefore [L3] makes them equal on the whole connected set C. This holds for every overlap component, so Ej and Fj1 glue to a holomorphic function Fj on GU1Uj.

L3step 1.1
3.1

Repeating step 2.1 for j=2,,N yields a holomorphic extension on the whole union GU1UN. Uniqueness at each stage follows from [L3], so the final extension is unique. The shell lemma [L2] identifies the geometric neighborhoods used later.

step 2.1L2L3discharge-construct

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources