How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Local Hartogs extensions propagate along chains and glue uniquely
Statement
Let be open, let be a connected open set, and let be domains with for every . Assume that for each and every there is satisfying on all of , and that after reordering every connected component of
meets .
Then every holomorphic function on extends uniquely to a holomorphic function on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A connected open set , open sets , and the local extension property stated above.
The local-extension hypothesis here explicitly requires agreement on the whole set , which is stronger than agreement on one open overlap in the general extension convention (Holomorphic extension and domains of holomorphy in several variables).
Coordinate shell neighborhoods are one class of open sets with the stated local extension property (Hartogs figures give local extension across polydisc shells).
Holomorphic functions on a connected open set agree everywhere once they agree on one nonempty open subset (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).
Proof
Let . By the explicit hypothesis for , there is with on all of . Hence and glue to a holomorphic function on .
Assume inductively that we have already obtained a holomorphic extension on . By hypothesis, the restriction of to extends holomorphically to some on . Let be a connected component of . The hypothesis makes nonempty, and since both and are open, is a nonempty open subset of . On that open set, and both agree with . Therefore [L3] makes them equal on the whole connected set . This holds for every overlap component, so and glue to a holomorphic function on .
Repeating step 2.1 for yields a holomorphic extension on the whole union . Uniqueness at each stage follows from [L3], so the final extension is unique. The shell lemma [L2] identifies the geometric neighborhoods used later.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)