Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cartan-Thullen boundary-radius theorem

Statement

Let ΩCm be a domain of holomorphy and let KΩ be compact. Then

δΩ(K^Ω)=δΩ(K).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact set KΩ, where Ω is a domain of holomorphy.

[L1]

A domain of holomorphy is one for which no fixed larger overlap admits extensions of every holomorphic function (Holomorphic extension and domains of holomorphy in several variables).

[L2]

For 0<r<δΩ(K), the derivatives of every holomorphic function on Ω satisfy uniform Cauchy bounds on K^Ω (Cauchy estimates propagate from a compact set to its hull).

[L3]

A holomorphic function has a power-series expansion on a polydisc, and a convergent several-variable power series defines a holomorphic function on its polydisc of convergence (A continuous separately holomorphic function is the sum of an absolutely convergent power series with Cauchy-integral coefficients on every smaller polydisc, An absolutely convergent multi-indexed power series is holomorphic and differentiates termwise).

[L4]

The hull contains the original compact set (Holomorphic hulls and holomorphic convexity).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L4], one has KK^Ω, so δΩ(K^Ω)δΩ(K). It remains to prove the reverse inequality.

L4given
1.2

Fix wK^Ω and a number s with 0<s<δΩ(K). For every holomorphic f on Ω, [L2] gives uniform bounds on all derivatives of f at w of the form αf(w)Csα!s(α1++αm) for a constant Cs depending on f, K, and s but not on α. By [L3], the Taylor series of f at w therefore converges on the full polydisc Δs(w) and defines a holomorphic function there that agrees with f on some smaller polydisc already contained in Ω.

L2L3given
2.1

If Δs(w) were not contained in Ω, then the smaller overlap from step 1.2 and the larger domain Δs(w) would extend every holomorphic function on Ω, contradicting [L1]. Hence Δs(w)Ω, so δΩ(w)s. Since this holds for every wK^Ω and every s<δΩ(K), one gets δΩ(K^Ω)δΩ(K). Together with step 1.1, this proves the equality.

L1step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources