Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Centralizer containment is sufficient but not necessary

Statement refuted

The sufficient condition CG(D)H for induction of an H-block of defect D is necessary.

Counterexample

In characteristic 2, take G=D2n=r,srn=s2=1, srs=r1 with n odd, and H=rCn. The principal block b0(H) has defect 1 and induces to b0(G), but CG(1)=G≰H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A splitting residue field k of characteristic 2 and the displayed groups, with n1 odd.

[F1]

A block induced from a subgroup defines induction by the unique block bimodule containing the restricted summand.

[F2]

Centralizer containment makes block induction well-defined states the sufficient condition whose converse is tested.

[F3]

Principal block has sylow defect gives the principal defect groups.

Proof

1.1

The averaging element e=n1j=0n1rj exists since n is odd. Counting the n occurrences of each rj in the square proves e2=e. Conjugation by r,s permutes its terms, so it is central in kG. Its ideal in kH is the one-dimensional algebra ke, since rje=e, and augmentation sends e to 1. Hence b0(H)=ke. F3 gives defect 1, since H has odd order.

F3algebra
2.1

The ideal kGe has basis e,se, supported on the disjoint cosets H,sH. Its multiplication satisfies (se)2=e, so it is kC2. By F4 it has no nontrivial idempotents; consequently e is primitive central in kG. As it acts by identity on the trivial module, kGe=b0(G). On restriction to H×H both e and se are fixed: H is normal and he=e for all hH. Thus the restriction is two copies of ke as a bimodule.

F4step 1.1algebra
3.1

For any other block idempotent f, ef=0, so left multiplication by e is zero on the whole bimodule kGf and its restriction. On ke that operator is identity. Therefore ke cannot be isomorphic to a summand of such a restriction. F1 proves uniqueness and b0(H)G=b0(G). Yet the centralizer of the trivial subgroup is G, while H has index two. This contradicts the proposed necessity, without contradicting F2's sufficient implication. For n=1 the same computation is H=1, G=C2; for the smallest nonabelian case n=3, D6S3SL2(F2), the latter via its faithful action on the three nonzero vectors and its order six. No semisimplicity or choice assumption is needed.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources