How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Centralizer containment is sufficient but not necessary
Statement refuted
The sufficient condition for induction of an -block of defect is necessary.
Counterexample
In characteristic , take with odd, and . The principal block has defect and induces to , but .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A splitting residue field of characteristic and the displayed groups, with odd.
A block induced from a subgroup defines induction by the unique block bimodule containing the restricted summand.
Centralizer containment makes block induction well-defined states the sufficient condition whose converse is tested.
Principal block has sylow defect gives the principal defect groups.
Proof
The averaging element exists since is odd. Counting the occurrences of each in the square proves . Conjugation by permutes its terms, so it is central in . Its ideal in is the one-dimensional algebra , since , and augmentation sends to . Hence . F3 gives defect , since has odd order.
The ideal has basis , supported on the disjoint cosets . Its multiplication satisfies , so it is . By F4 it has no nontrivial idempotents; consequently is primitive central in . As it acts by identity on the trivial module, . On restriction to both and are fixed: is normal and for all . Thus the restriction is two copies of as a bimodule.
For any other block idempotent , , so left multiplication by is zero on the whole bimodule and its restriction. On that operator is identity. Therefore cannot be isomorphic to a summand of such a restriction. F1 proves uniqueness and . Yet the centralizer of the trivial subgroup is , while has index two. This contradicts the proposed necessity, without contradicting F2's sufficient implication. For the same computation is , ; for the smallest nonabelian case , , the latter via its faithful action on the three nonzero vectors and its order six. No semisimplicity or choice assumption is needed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Saunders, Modular Representation Theory, Example 5.15 (standard reference, not scraped)