How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Brauers First Main Theorem — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Blocks Defect Groups and the Brauer Homomorphism
- Brauer Characters and Decomposition Matrices
- Brauers First Main Theorem
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Induced Representations, Frobenius Reciprocity and Applications
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modular Representations and Projective Covers
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Vertices Sources and the Green Correspondence
2 · Summary
Explicit local algebra calculations identify the defect-D8 correspondence in S7. Symmetric powers, regular conjugacy classes and lower-triangular restrictions determine the two positive-defect blocks of SL2 over Fp and isolate its Steinberg block. A dihedral example disproves necessity of centralizer containment; the final example checks trivial defect and identity normalizers, including empty sets.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Brauer correspondence for a defect-D8 block of S7 in characteristic 2
Example
Let be a splitting residue field of characteristic for and its subgroups. Put , acting on . Then and , where acts on . Its unique nonprincipal block has defect group and corresponds to the unique block of with defect group . The principal local block has the larger Sylow defect . These assertions are choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field, group and subgroup in the example.
Brauer's First Main Theorem gives the fixed-defect bijection.
Principal block has sylow defect identifies principal defects.
Blocks partition the ordinary and Brauer irreducible characters identifies the principal block through the trivial module.
For a finite group and a field of characteristic p, the group algebra is local exactly when the group is a p-group makes finite -group algebras local, hence without nontrivial idempotents.
Defect groups are maximal Brauer support detects defect by maximal nonzero Brauer projection.
Brauer homomorphism for a p subgroup deletes coefficients outside a centralizer.
Proof
Write and . Then , and , giving exactly the eight elements . A normalizer preserves the common fixed set , so it is . The first factor has order or by divisibility. It is not : conjugating to leaves , whose only transpositions are and . Therefore it is .
In the last write , . The element is a central idempotent in characteristic . Its ideal has basis and is , since . The complementary idempotent is . To identify its four-dimensional ideal, represent by and by . Direct multiplication gives , and . The image contains , , , and . Thus it is all ; dimension gives .
Hence . F4 makes the first factor local and gives no nontrivial idempotents in . A central matrix commuting with every matrix unit is a scalar matrix over ; thus the second factor has no nontrivial central idempotents either. These are exactly the two blocks. Augmentation is on and on , so F3 places the trivial module in the first, the principal block. Its defect is by F2.
Regard as an element of . Both support elements centralize , so . If a -subgroup of properly contains , its projection to is a subgroup of order . Its involution centralizes neither nor . Thus neither support element centralizes and . F5 and F6 prove that is a defect group of the second block.
F1 now gives exactly one global block having as a defect group, paired with this nonprincipal local block. It is not the global principal block: the -part of is , whereas , and F2 gives Sylow defect for the principal block. The larger local principal defect has order as well. All idempotents and matrix units were displayed; there is no zero block, empty correspondence, endpoint parameter or choice operation in this calculation. The correspondence is bijective in both directions by F1.
Brauer correspondence for SL2(Fp) in defining characteristic
Example
Assume AC, let be prime and let be a splitting residue field for and its subgroups. Put and . In the standard list , , the modules with odd form one block and those with even form the other positive-defect block. Both have defect . They correspond to the two blocks of , distinguished by the sign of the central element . The Green correspondent of for is its restriction, whose head has torus weight . The remaining , the Steinberg module, is projective simple in a defect-zero block.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field and matrix groups above; on the natural column basis , a lower unipotent sends to and fixes .
The Axiom of Choice is inherited only in the exact-vertex Green identification.
Brauer's First Main Theorem is the choice-free block bijection.
Brauer–Green block compatibility matches blocks of vertex- restriction summands.
Blocks partition the ordinary and Brauer irreducible characters assigns each simple module to one block.
The number of simple kG-modules equals the number of p-regular conjugacy classes counts simple modules over the splitting field.
Higman's criterion characterizes relative projectivity through the relative trace idempotent test gives the trace and split counit criteria.
Normal p-subgroups fix block idempotents under Brauer projection localizes normalizer block idempotents to .
Defect groups are maximal Brauer support detects exact defect.
Defect zero blocks are simple algebras characterizes blocks with a projective simple module.
Relative projectivity mackey intersections for finite modules places a vertex inside a relative inducing subgroup, up to conjugacy.
Green correspondence for modules of vertex exactly p identifies the unique vertex- restriction summand under AC.
Proof
Counting a nonzero first column and then the second columns with determinant one gives , so is Sylow of order . Its common fixed line is . A normalizer must preserve that line, hence is lower triangular. Conversely the lower triangular matrices normalize by direct conjugation. Thus , where . Such a diagonal conjugates to , so .
Put . On the basis , the operator , for with , lowers the highest -degree by one with leading coefficient when . Its successive powers on therefore give a triangular basis. It is one Jordan block of size , with kernel . Every nonzero invariant subspace contains a nonzero kernel vector, by applying a maximal nonvanishing power of this nilpotent operator. The upper unipotent acts in the reverse way, and its powers of on span the whole space. Hence every nonzero -submodule is all of : these modules are simple and have distinct dimensions. This also covers .
The -regular matrices in are exactly the semisimple ones. Indeed finite order prime to gives a square-free annihilating polynomial; conversely a semisimple matrix has eigenvalues in and hence order prime to . For every trace , the polynomial has distinct roots, and its companion matrix gives one class. It gives one class too: the determinant map from its centralizer is onto. In the split case this follows from diagonal matrices. In the nonsplit case the centralizer is acting by multiplication, with determinant for a nonsquare . For each , the sets of squares and times squares, meaning and , each have elements and intersect; thus has a solution. Multiplying a conjugator by a centralizer element adjusts its determinant to one. Trace gives only the semisimple matrices . There are exactly regular classes. F4 proves that the list in step 1.2 exhausts all simple modules.
The subspaces spanned by are -stable and give a full composition flag. Since is a single Jordan block, its invariant subspaces are precisely these: viewing the module as , submodules are ideals . Thus restriction to is indecomposable and has a unique head, the line represented by . Define on by trivial action and acting by . The head is , and the factors from head down are . The element acts throughout by .
By F7 every central block idempotent of lies in . This commutative algebra is , whose only primitive idempotents are and , by F5. These are central in , so they are exactly its two block idempotents. Each has nonzero Brauer projection at (all its support centralizes ); since is Sylow, F8 gives defect for both.
For either or , every finite -module is relatively -projective: the relative trace of is the identity, so F6 applies. Also , with . Every finite projective module over this algebra is free. To see this, lift a basis of to obtain a surjection , since its cokernel vanishes by . Split this surjection; its kernel has by dimensions and thus is zero by the same nilpotence argument. Consequently the single Jordan module of dimension is not projective on , and cannot be projective on , since restriction preserves finite free modules and their summands. F10 and F11 give it vertex , the only alternative inside being , which would imply projectivity by F6's finite counit. This applies to both and its restriction. For the restriction to is regular free; the split counit from relative -projectivity makes a summand of a free induced module, hence projective.
F1 gives exactly two global blocks with defect ; every positive defect is conjugate to since its order divides the -part of . For , step 3.1 and F2 identify the block of with induction of the local block containing its restriction. Step 2.2 identifies this as when is odd and when is even. Both sets occur, since or with these same two indices. Under A1, F12 identifies the indecomposable vertex- restriction itself as the Green correspondent. AC is used only in this invocation; the trace, sign and block calculations did not use it.
By F9 the projective simple is alone in a defect-zero block. The exhaustive list in step 2.1 and the partition in F3 leave no further blocks: every nonzero finite block has a simple quotient by a proper left ideal of largest dimension. Thus the two positive-defect blocks and this Steinberg block are all the blocks. The endpoint was included in the constant-polynomial calculation, and is precisely the projective exception. The hypothesis ensures the two sign idempotents exist and are distinct; the assertion does not extend this calculation to .
Centralizer containment is sufficient but not necessary
Statement refuted
The sufficient condition for induction of an -block of defect is necessary.
Counterexample
In characteristic , take with odd, and . The principal block has defect and induces to , but .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A splitting residue field of characteristic and the displayed groups, with odd.
A block induced from a subgroup defines induction by the unique block bimodule containing the restricted summand.
Centralizer containment makes block induction well-defined states the sufficient condition whose converse is tested.
Principal block has sylow defect gives the principal defect groups.
Proof
The averaging element exists since is odd. Counting the occurrences of each in the square proves . Conjugation by permutes its terms, so it is central in . Its ideal in is the one-dimensional algebra , since , and augmentation sends to . Hence . F3 gives defect , since has odd order.
The ideal has basis , supported on the disjoint cosets . Its multiplication satisfies , so it is . By F4 it has no nontrivial idempotents; consequently is primitive central in . As it acts by identity on the trivial module, . On restriction to both and are fixed: is normal and for all . Thus the restriction is two copies of as a bimodule.
For any other block idempotent , , so left multiplication by is zero on the whole bimodule and its restriction. On that operator is identity. Therefore cannot be isomorphic to a summand of such a restriction. F1 proves uniqueness and . Yet the centralizer of the trivial subgroup is , while has index two. This contradicts the proposed necessity, without contradicting F2's sufficient implication. For the same computation is , ; for the smallest nonabelian case , , the latter via its faithful action on the three nonzero vectors and its order six. No semisimplicity or choice assumption is needed.
The trivial-defect-group and identity-normalizer boundaries
Example
For , one has , and Brauer's First Main Theorem is the identity bijection on defect-zero blocks. More generally, if , its defect- bijection is the identity, including when the relevant set is empty. No AC is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and splitting residue field of characteristic , with a fixed -subgroup .
Brauer's First Main Theorem specifies the fixed-defect bijection by induction.
Defect zero blocks are simple algebras identifies trivial-defect blocks with full matrix blocks, each having one projective simple module.
A block induced from a subgroup uses the unique block containing the block-bimodule restriction summand.
Proof
If , restriction from to itself changes no module. A block bimodule occurs in itself. It cannot occur in another block : the central idempotent of acts as identity on and as zero on , hence on all its summands. Thus F3 gives , and F1's map and inverse are the identity on the set of blocks with defect group . This proves both directions of the correspondence directly.
For , every group element normalizes , so step 1.1 applies. The numerical defect is , and F2 says exactly these blocks are full matrix algebras with one projective simple module. If there are no such blocks, the identity has empty domain and codomain: its injectivity condition and the assertion that every codomain element has a preimage are both vacuous. The same reasoning handles an empty defect- set whenever is normal. The zero algebra is not inserted as a block. All these identity and idempotent calculations are choice-free.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Craven, The Brauer Correspondence, §1.6 example for S7, pp. 13–16
- Saunders, Modular Representation Theory, Examples 4.31 and 5.5
- Saunders, Modular Representation Theory, Example 5.15
- Martínez, Representation Theory of Finite Groups, Theorem 4.10, pp. 27–28
- Farrell–Lassueur, Modular Representation Theory of Finite Groups, Theorem 40.4, §40 (printed pp.8–12 of upload17)