How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Brauer correspondence for a defect-D8 block of S7 in characteristic 2
Example
Let be a splitting residue field of characteristic for and its subgroups. Put , acting on . Then and , where acts on . Its unique nonprincipal block has defect group and corresponds to the unique block of with defect group . The principal local block has the larger Sylow defect . These assertions are choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field, group and subgroup in the example.
Brauer's First Main Theorem gives the fixed-defect bijection.
Principal block has sylow defect identifies principal defects.
Blocks partition the ordinary and Brauer irreducible characters identifies the principal block through the trivial module.
For a finite group and a field of characteristic p, the group algebra is local exactly when the group is a p-group makes finite -group algebras local, hence without nontrivial idempotents.
Defect groups are maximal Brauer support detects defect by maximal nonzero Brauer projection.
Brauer homomorphism for a p subgroup deletes coefficients outside a centralizer.
Proof
Write and . Then , and , giving exactly the eight elements . A normalizer preserves the common fixed set , so it is . The first factor has order or by divisibility. It is not : conjugating to leaves , whose only transpositions are and . Therefore it is .
In the last write , . The element is a central idempotent in characteristic . Its ideal has basis and is , since . The complementary idempotent is . To identify its four-dimensional ideal, represent by and by . Direct multiplication gives , and . The image contains , , , and . Thus it is all ; dimension gives .
Hence . F4 makes the first factor local and gives no nontrivial idempotents in . A central matrix commuting with every matrix unit is a scalar matrix over ; thus the second factor has no nontrivial central idempotents either. These are exactly the two blocks. Augmentation is on and on , so F3 places the trivial module in the first, the principal block. Its defect is by F2.
Regard as an element of . Both support elements centralize , so . If a -subgroup of properly contains , its projection to is a subgroup of order . Its involution centralizes neither nor . Thus neither support element centralizes and . F5 and F6 prove that is a defect group of the second block.
F1 now gives exactly one global block having as a defect group, paired with this nonprincipal local block. It is not the global principal block: the -part of is , whereas , and F2 gives Sylow defect for the principal block. The larger local principal defect has order as well. All idempotents and matrix units were displayed; there is no zero block, empty correspondence, endpoint parameter or choice operation in this calculation. The correspondence is bijective in both directions by F1.
Depends on
- Brauer's First Main Theorem
- Principal block has sylow defect
- Blocks partition the ordinary and Brauer irreducible characters
- For a finite group and a field of characteristic p, the group algebra is local exactly when the group is a p-group
- Defect groups are maximal Brauer support
- Brauer homomorphism for a p subgroup
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Craven, The Brauer Correspondence, §1.6 example for S7, pp. 13–16 (standard reference, not scraped)