How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Brauer's First Main Theorem
Statement
Let be a fixed -subgroup of finite , let , and use a splitting -modular residue field . Block induction is a bijection The sets may be empty. The bijection commutes with -conjugation of and requires no AC.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated finite group, field and actual subgroup .
A global block of defect D determines a local block of defect D gives a local defect- inducing block for every global defect- block.
Distinct local full-defect blocks induce to distinct global blocks gives injectivity.
Every local full-defect block induces to a global block of defect D gives definedness for every local input and preserves the exact defect group.
Proof
F3 makes the displayed assignment a function with the stated codomain. F2 makes it injective, and F1 makes it onto. These are precisely the two bijection conditions, including if either set is empty: F1 and F3 then force the other to be empty as well.
For , conjugation carries to , sends a block ideal to the conjugate ideal, and transports the double-group action and every split inclusion/retraction by the algebra isomorphism . A diagonal vertex is carried to , since relative induction splittings and subgroup minimality are transported in both directions. Thus conjugating the summand condition defining gives by uniqueness. If , restriction to the same double group is identity and each block is its own unique inducing block, so the bijection is identity. In particular gives the identity on defect-zero blocks. This proves equivariance and all boundaries; no preferred representative of a conjugacy class is chosen. F1–F3 are choice-free and the present maps are explicit, so no AC is required.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Martínez, Representation Theory of Finite Groups, Theorem 4.10, pp. 27–28 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Craven, The Brauer Correspondence, Theorem 1.12, pp. 9–10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Farrell–Lassueur, Modular Representation Theory of Finite Groups, Theorem 40.4, §40 (printed pp.8–12 of upload17) (standard reference, not scraped)