How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A conservative positive-pressure SPH system can close a particle gap
Statement refuted
In a conservative SPH system with positive pressure, every adjacent particle gap has nonnegative initial relative acceleration. This is false: a third-particle pressure force can close a neighboring gap even while the semidiscrete invariants remain exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Let d=1, N=3, m_i=1, ε>0, q_1=0, q_2=9ε/10, q_3=13ε/10, and v_i=0 initially. Use W(s)=(35/32)(1−s²)³ for |s|≤1 and zero otherwise, the smooth ideal-gas pressure map P(ρ,e)=(γ−1)ρe with γ>1, and e_i=p_0ρ_i(q)/(γ−1) initially, where p_0>0.
Fixed-width regularized conservative SPH particle system: A_i=P(ρ_i,e_i)/ρ_i² and the particle acceleration is the symmetric pressure-gradient sum.
SPH pressure forces are equal-opposite and central: the paired pressure forces are equal-opposite and central.
Linear and angular momentum are conserved by semidiscrete SPH: total linear and angular momenta are constant along solutions.
The matched internal-energy equation conserves total semidiscrete energy: H=Σ_i(|v_i|²/2+e_i) is constant along solutions for unit masses.
Local well-posedness of the regularized finite-particle SPH system: a unique local solution exists from every positive-density state.
Counterexample
The polynomial kernel is nonnegative and even. At s=±1 its value and first two inside derivatives vanish, so extension by zero is C²; its integral is (35/32)·2(1−1+3/5−1/7)=1. Each density is positive because its self term W_ε(0)>0. The chosen internal energies give p_i=(γ−1)ρ_ie_i=p_0ρ_i²>0 and A_i=p_0 at t=0. By [F1] and [F5], a unique local solution exists; pressure positivity persists for a short interval by continuity.
For 0<s<1, |W′(s)|=(105/16)s(1−s²)². Direct substitution gives |W′(2/5)|/|W′(9/10)|=28224/3249>2. Also |q_3−q_1|=13ε/10>ε, so the 1–3 kernel-gradient term vanishes.
Let r(t)=q_2(t)−q_1(t). From [F1] and step 1.2, the accelerations at t=0 are q̈_1=−2p_0ε^(−2)|W′(9/10)| and q̈_2=2p_0ε^(−2)(|W′(9/10)|−|W′(2/5)|). Therefore r̈(0)=2p_0ε^(−2)(2|W′(9/10)|−|W′(2/5)|)<0.
Since ṙ(0)=0 and r̈ is continuous, ṙ(t)<0 and r(t)<r(0) for all sufficiently small t>0. Thus the adjacent gap closes initially under strictly positive pressure.
The exact pair antisymmetry and matched internal-energy identity apply by [F2] and [F4], so total momentum and H are conserved throughout this same local motion. The example therefore refutes the claimed gap-stability implication while retaining those invariants.
Depends on
- Fixed-width regularized conservative SPH particle system
- SPH pressure forces are equal-opposite and central
- Linear and angular momentum are conserved by semidiscrete SPH
- The matched internal-energy equation conserves total semidiscrete energy
- Local well-posedness of the regularized finite-particle SPH system
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Volker Springel, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics in Astrophysics, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 48 (2010), author full text (standard reference, not scraped)
- Benjamin Seibold, MIT OpenCourseWare 18.336, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Lecture 25: Particle Methods (Spring 2009) (standard reference, not scraped)