How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A continuous function with divergent Fourier series at a prescribed point
Statement refuted
Continuity of a one-periodic real function guarantees convergence of its Fourier series at a prescribed point.
More precisely, assume DC. For every there exists such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: DC and a prescribed point .
On real or complex the functional is bounded, has norm , and these norms are unbounded (Fourier partial-sum operator norm equals the Lebesgue constant).
Assuming DC, a pointwise bounded family of bounded linear maps from a Banach space to a normed space has uniformly bounded operator norms (Uniform boundedness principle).
For a nonempty compact metric space , is complete in the supremum metric ( is complete in the supremum metric for every nonempty compact metric space ).
Assuming countable choice, if a one-period integrable function satisfies for some , then (Dini pointwise convergence criterion for Fourier series).
Counterexample
Let with the supremum norm. The interval is nonempty and compact, so a Cauchy sequence in has a continuous uniform limit by the completeness theorem. Its endpoint values remain equal, since for every approximating member . Thus is a real Banach space, identified isometrically with the real continuous periodic functions.
Define by . These maps are real-valued bounded linear functionals, and . If all had , uniform boundedness on this Banach space would make the operator norms uniformly bounded. Hence there exists a real with . Every individual value is finite, so this sequence cannot converge.
For this witness, vanishing on any neighborhood of is impossible: if it vanished there, choose within that neighborhood. The Dini integral with would be zero, giving . DC supplies the countable choice assumed by that criterion. This contradicts the unboundedness in step 2.1 and proves the stated localization observation.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)