How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dini pointwise convergence criterion for Fourier series
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.
Let be a one-period integrable function, let , and assume there is such that
Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a one-period integrable function , reals , and a real with such that
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, Fourier coefficients of an function tend to at infinity (Riemann-Lebesgue lemma for Fourier coefficients).
Proof
Put . By [L3],
For , one has , so [L4] gives . Define Then so the hypothesis makes . Using [L1],
Define Since is bounded away from on and , one has . Again [L1] turns the second integral in step 1.1 into
By [L2], both and tend to . Steps 2.1 and 2.2 therefore make both integrals in step 1.1 tend to . Hence , or equivalently .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)