How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Local Holder regularity implies Fourier convergence at a point
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.
Let be a one-period integrable function and let . Suppose there are constants , , and such that
for every . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a one-period integrable function , a real , constants and , and a real with such that for every .
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, if then (Dini pointwise convergence criterion for Fourier series).
Proof
For , the triangle inequality and the hypotheses give
Therefore
Applying [L1] with and using step 2.1 gives .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)