How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A degenerate two-parameter map can collapse its image to a curve
Statement refuted
A continuous map of a two-dimensional parameter region into need not describe a regular surface: its image can be only a curve.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map , .
A regular surface patch must be injective in its interior and have nonzero parameter cross product there (Regular parametrized surface patches on compact Jordan parameter regions).
The cross product is given by its coordinate formula (The cross product in ).
Counterexample
The parameter derivatives are and , so [L2] gives at every point.
Also is independent of , so the map is not injective on the interior, and its image is exactly the line segment .
Both regularity requirements in [L1] fail throughout the interior, and the image is one-dimensional. This supplies the claimed collapse.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. E. Taylor, Introduction to Analysis in Several Variables, regular surface charts (standard reference, not scraped)