How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Filtered vector spaces can be additive with kernels and cokernels without being abelian
Statement refuted
Every additive category with all kernels and cokernels is abelian.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field .
An abelian category is in particular additive and requires the canonical coimage-to-image map to be an isomorphism (Additive category, Abelian category).
Counterexample
Let be the category whose objects are -filtered -vector spaces and whose morphisms preserve the filtrations. Pointwise addition on linear maps and direct sums with make additive, and kernels and cokernels are computed on the underlying linear map with the induced and quotient filtrations.
Take with for and for , while for and for . The identity linear map preserves filtrations, has zero kernel and zero cokernel, so and . But is not an isomorphism in , because its inverse does not preserve . Hence the canonical map is not an isomorphism, so is not abelian.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.3, Example 12.3.13 (standard reference, not scraped)