Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Four closed sets can cover S2 without any one containing an antipodal pair

Statement refuted

The conclusion for a closed cover by three sets remains true for a closed cover by four sets: whenever four closed subsets cover S2, one member contains a pair of antipodal points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unit sphere S2R3.

[F1]

If three closed subsets cover S2, one of them contains a pair of antipodal points (One member of every three-set closed cover of S2 contains an antipodal pair).

[F3]

The sphere S2 is the set of unit vectors in R3 (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn).

[L1]

A map into Rm is continuous exactly when its component functions are continuous; sums and scalar multiples of continuous Euclidean-valued maps are continuous (A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions).

Counterexample

technique · constructive
1.1

Let v1=(1,1,1)3,v2=(1,1,1)3,v3=(1,1,1)3,v4=(1,1,1)3, and for 1i4 define Ai={xS2:x,vix,vj for every 1j4}. The vectors vi are the vertices of a regular tetrahedron centred at 0.

givenF2F3constructalgebra
2.1

By [F2] and [L1], each Ai is a finite intersection of sets defined by a continuous closed inequality x,vivj0, hence is closed in S2. For every xS2, the finite set of four real numbers x,vj has a maximum, so x belongs to at least one Ai. Thus A1,A2,A3,A4 cover S2.

step 1.1F2L1algebra
2.2

Suppose x,xAi. Then x,vivj0 and x,vivj0 for every j, so all these inner products vanish. For i=1, the vectors v1v2, v1v3, and v1v4 are scalar multiples of (0,1,1), (1,0,1), and (1,1,0), whose determinant is 20; the other values of i differ only by coordinate sign changes and permutations. Hence the three differences span R3, forcing x=0, contrary to xS2. No Ai contains an antipodal pair.

step 1.1F2F3algebra
3.1

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 give a closed four-set cover with no antipodal pair in any member, refuting the proposed extension and showing that the three-set conclusion [F1] cannot be enlarged in this way.

step 2.1step 2.2F1discharge-construct

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources