How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The full dual of an infinite group algebra has no transpose coproduct
Statement refuted
For every algebra over a field, transposing multiplication gives a coproduct on the full linear dual, where the tensor product is algebraic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An infinite group , the group algebra , its full linear dual , and the algebraic tensor product. Refute the claimed algebraic coproduct by a row-rank argument.
Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums: every element of an algebraic tensor product is a finite sum of elementary tensors.
The finite dual of an associative algebra: the restricted dual consists of functionals factoring through finite-dimensional quotient algebras.
The elements of form a linearly independent basis of , and is the function equal to at the identity and elsewhere.
Refutation
Every linear functional on the free vector space is determined by arbitrary values on the basis , so identifies with all functions . The standard maps , and make a Hopf algebra: the coproduct is multiplicative on basis products, coassociative and counital on each group element, and the two antipode products equal . Multiplication therefore has transpose , and .
Suppose came from a tensor . For each fixed , its row function of would be , hence all row functions would lie in the finite-dimensional span of .
The actual row at is , the point mass at . As ranges over infinite , these are infinitely many distinct point masses; any finite subfamily is linearly independent by evaluation at its respective support point. Their span is therefore infinite-dimensional, contradicting step 1.2. Thus and the asserted full-dual coproduct does not exist in the algebraic tensor category. This does not rule out the restricted dual of [F2].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kalle Kytölä, Introduction to Hopf algebras and representations, lecture notes, §§4.3–4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych and Victor Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §7.14 (standard reference, not scraped)