Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The full dual of an infinite group algebra has no transpose coproduct

Statement refuted

For every algebra A over a field, transposing multiplication gives a coproduct A∗→A∗⊗A∗ on the full linear dual, where the tensor product is algebraic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An infinite group G, the group algebra H=kG, its full linear dual H∗, and the algebraic tensor product. Refute the claimed algebraic coproduct by a row-rank argument.

[F1]

Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums: every element of an algebraic tensor product is a finite sum of elementary tensors.

[F2]

The finite dual of an associative algebra: the restricted dual A∘ consists of functionals factoring through finite-dimensional quotient algebras.

[A1]

The elements of G form a linearly independent basis of kG, and δe is the function equal to 1 at the identity and 0 elsewhere.

Refutation

1.1givenA1construct

Every linear functional on the free vector space kG is determined by arbitrary values on the basis G, so H∗=Hom⁡k(H,k) identifies with all functions G→k. The standard maps Δ(g)=g⊗g, ε(g)=1 and S(g)=g−1 make kG a Hopf algebra: the coproduct is multiplicative on basis products, coassociative and counital on each group element, and the two antipode products equal e. Multiplication μ:H⊗H→H therefore has transpose μ∗:H∗→(H⊗H)∗, and μ∗(δe)(a,b)=δe(ab).

1.2givenF1algebra

Suppose μ∗(δe) came from a tensor ∑i=1nFi⊗Gi∈H∗⊗H∗. For each fixed a∈G, its row function of b would be ∑i=1nFi(a)Gi(b), hence all row functions would lie in the finite-dimensional span of G1,…,Gn.

2.1A1F2step 1.2algebra∎

The actual row at a is b↦δe(ab)=1b=a−1, the point mass at a−1. As a ranges over infinite G, these are infinitely many distinct point masses; any finite subfamily is linearly independent by evaluation at its respective support point. Their span is therefore infinite-dimensional, contradicting step 1.2. Thus μ∗(δe)∉H∗⊗H∗ and the asserted full-dual coproduct does not exist in the algebraic tensor category. This does not rule out the restricted dual H∘ of [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources