How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Drinfeld double of a finite group algebra
Example
Let be a finite group and a field. The group algebra has basis , coproduct , counit and antipode . The dual has point-mass basis . In the finite double, the basis elements satisfy
with and . Its canonical -matrix and inverse are
For a left-left Yetter–Drinfeld module, the coaction is a -grading , the action satisfies , and the braiding is for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group , a field , and the finite-double formulas and Yetter–Drinfeld equivalence stated below. Verify the basis formulas and the module description.
Finite Drinfeld double: convention and candidate multiplication: the normal-order product is .
Finite double and its canonical quasitriangular structure: the canonical tensor is and its inverse uses .
Modules over the finite double are left-left Yetter–Drinfeld modules: the left-left Yetter–Drinfeld braiding is .
Group algebras, finite-group function algebras, and polynomial Hopf algebras: the group algebra has coproduct , counit and antipode .
The group basis elements multiply by the group law and are invertible; the point mass evaluates to at and at every other group element.
Verification
The group-like maps are those of [F1]; multiplicativity, coassociativity and both counit equations hold on each group basis vector, and . The dual coproduct is , since both sides evaluate on as .
For and dual factors and , the iterated dual coproduct is . In [L1], the scalar factors require and , so ; the remaining convolution is pointwise multiplication and is zero unless . This gives the stated double product.
The dual bases of are and . Substitution in [L3] gives the displayed and inverse, since .
Substituting and into [L2] gives the stated coproduct and counit. The antipode formula becomes ; reordering by the product of step 1.2 gives .
For any left -coaction write , a finite sum. Coassociativity and comparison of coefficients in the group basis imply , while counitality gives ; uniqueness of these coefficients makes the sum of the subspaces direct. Conversely such a grading defines a coaction. For homogeneous , the Yetter–Drinfeld equation at is exactly , so compatibility is equivalent to conjugation compatibility. The braiding [L4] is therefore .
Depends on
- Finite Drinfeld double: convention and candidate multiplication
- Double coalgebra, multiplicativity, and antipode
- Group algebras, finite-group function algebras, and polynomial Hopf algebras
- Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums
- Modules over the finite double are left-left Yetter–Drinfeld modules
- Finite double and its canonical quasitriangular structure
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kalle Kytölä, Introduction to Hopf algebras and representations, lecture notes, §4.3, Example 4.21 and Exercise 42 (standard reference, not scraped)
- G. A. García and C. Vay, Simple modules of small quantum groups at dihedral groups, Doc. Math. 29 (2024), §3.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)