How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite double and its canonical quasitriangular structure
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra over a field with bijective antipode, and let and be dual bases of and . In the factor order , the tensor
is basis-independent and invertible, with
It is quasitriangular in the convention
On every pair of left -modules, is the Yetter–Drinfeld braiding of Modules over the finite double are left-left Yetter–Drinfeld modules.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional Hopf algebra with bijective antipode, its finite double , and the left-left Yetter–Drinfeld equivalence and braiding already proved. Prove the canonical tensor is a basis-independent invertible and satisfies the three quasitriangular identities.
Finite tensor duality and basis-independent coevaluation: for dual bases , is basis-independent and represents under .
Finite Drinfeld double: convention and candidate multiplication: in normal order .
Double coalgebra, multiplicativity, and antipode: is a Hopf algebra with .
Modules over the finite double are left-left Yetter–Drinfeld modules: on left -modules the map is a natural, invertible module braiding satisfying both hexagons.
Leg notation and quasitriangular Hopf algebras: in the fixed left-associated triple tensor, the second quasitriangular hexagon is .
The module category of a bialgebra and its tensor action: a bialgebra acts diagonally on tensor products of modules, including its regular left module.
Finite Hopf algebras have one-dimensional integral spaces and bijective antipode: the antipode of a nonzero finite-dimensional Hopf algebra is bijective.
Uniqueness and anti-multiplicativity and anti-comultiplicativity of the antipode: the antipode is anti-multiplicative.
The antipode of is bijective; this is explicit because uses . Also : its counit is a unital algebra map, so ; consequently the nonzero hypothesis of [F4] is satisfied.
Proof
By [F1], represents , so it is independent of the chosen dual bases. Applying the embeddings and in the two tensor factors preserves this independence and gives the displayed .
Applying to the two antipode equations, and reversing products by the anti-multiplicativity result [F5], gives . Multiplying by the proposed inverse, the first double factor uses and the second uses . Pairing the first dual factor with gives . In the reverse product the pairing is . Finite dual separation [F1] makes both products .
On any two left -modules, by the dual-basis identity . Thus is the natural invertible module braiding of [L3].
Apply -linearity of this braiding to the regular left modules , whose tensor actions are supplied by [F3]. Since , pulling the target action on back along the flip gives the operator identity on . Evaluating at yields .
Apply the hexagon from [L3] to three regular modules with their tensor actions [F3]. Substituting and tracking the initial order makes its two crossing operators followed by ; hence their combined operator is . The left side is the block flip applied to , with the fixed reassociation, so [F2] gives . The other hexagon first crosses positions and then , producing and thus . Evaluating both regular-module operator identities at proves equality in . These are the stated leg conventions, so all three quasitriangular identities hold.
Remarks
No triangularity assertion is made. The exact leg convention, including the associator in the second hexagon, has been checked against the batch-8 definition body.
Depends on
- Finite Drinfeld double: convention and candidate multiplication
- Double coalgebra, multiplicativity, and antipode
- Modules over the finite double are left-left Yetter–Drinfeld modules
- Finite tensor duality and basis-independent coevaluation
- Leg notation and quasitriangular Hopf algebras
- Braiding on the module category and triangular structures
- The module category of a bialgebra and its tensor action
- Finite Hopf algebras have one-dimensional integral spaces and bijective antipode
- Uniqueness and anti-multiplicativity and anti-comultiplicativity of the antipode
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Leg notation and quasitriangular Hopf algebras.
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kalle Kytölä, Introduction to Hopf algebras and representations, lecture notes, §4.3, Theorem 4.18 (standard reference, not scraped)
- G. A. García and C. Vay, Simple modules of small quantum groups at dihedral groups, Doc. Math. 29 (2024), §3.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych and Victor Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §7.14 (standard reference, not scraped)