Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniqueness and anti-multiplicativity and anti-comultiplicativity of the antipode

Statement

Let H be a Hopf algebra over a field k, with antipode S, multiplication m, unit u, comultiplication Δ, and counit ε. Then S is unique, S(1)=1, and ε∘S=ε. Moreover, for all a,b∈H,

S(ab)=S(b)S(a),Δ(S(h))=(S⊗S)τΔ(h)(h∈H),

where τ(x⊗y)=y⊗x is the tensor flip. In particular, these are consequences of the convolution-inverse definition; they are not extra axioms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Hopf algebra H over k, with the structure maps named in the Statement.

[F1]

A bialgebra has Δ and ε as unital algebra maps, with (a⊗b)(c⊗d)=ac⊗bd (Bialgebras and bialgebra maps).

[F2]

The coalgebra on H⊗H has ΔH⊗H(a⊗b)=∑(a(1)⊗b(1))⊗(a(2)⊗b(2)) and counit ε(a)ε(b) (The tensor product of two coalgebras is a coalgebra).

[F3]

The algebra on H⊗H has (a⊗b)(c⊗d)=ac⊗bd and unit 1⊗1 (The tensor product of R-algebras has multiplication (a⊗b)(a′⊗b′)=aa′⊗bb′).

[F4]

On Hom⁡k(C,A), convolution is f∗g=mA(f⊗g)ΔC, it is associative, and its unit is uAεC (Convolution of linear maps is associative and unital).

[F5]

The antipode equations are S∗idH=uε=idH∗S (Hopf algebras and antipodes).

[F6]

Tensor products of linear maps and the flip are well-defined, and reassociation of the iterated tensor products is coherent (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially, Associator naturality, pentagon, unit triangle and symmetry hexagons on elementary tensors).

[F7]

Tensor powers use the stated canonical tensor-unit and associator identifications (Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF4F5algebra

If p,q are two two-sided convolution inverses of the same map r in a unital associative convolution algebra with unit e, then p=p∗(r∗q)=(p∗r)∗q=e∗q=q. Taking r=idH proves uniqueness of the antipode.

1.2givenF1F2F4F5F6algebra

Give Hom⁡k(H⊗H,H) convolution using the coalgebra of [F2] and the algebra of H. Define ϕ=S∘m and ψ=m∘(S⊗S)∘τ, which are well-defined by [F6]; thus ψ(a⊗b)=S(b)S(a). Both are two-sided inverses of m: (ϕ∗m)(a⊗b)=∑S(a(1)b(1))a(2)b(2)=ε(a)ε(b)1 and (m∗ϕ)(a⊗b)=∑a(1)b(1)S(a(2)b(2))=ε(a)ε(b)1 by the antipode equations at ab, multiplicativity of Δ, and multiplicativity of ε; also (ψ∗m)(a⊗b)=∑S(b(1))S(a(1))a(2)b(2)=ε(a)ε(b)1 and (m∗ψ)(a⊗b)=∑a(1)b(1)S(b(2))S(a(2))=ε(a)ε(b)1 by first contracting S(a(1))a(2) or b(1)S(b(2)) and then the remaining antipode pair. The right side is the convolution unit on H⊗H by [F2].

1.3givenF1F3F4F5algebra

Give Hom⁡k(H,H⊗H) convolution using Δ on the source and the tensor-product algebra on the target. The map Φ=Δ∘S is a two-sided inverse of Δ: (Φ∗Δ)(h)=∑Δ(S(h(1)))Δ(h(2))=Δ(∑S(h(1))h(2))=ε(h)(1⊗1) and (Δ∗Φ)(h)=∑Δ(h(1))Δ(S(h(2)))=Δ(∑h(1)S(h(2)))=ε(h)(1⊗1) by multiplicativity of Δ and the two antipode equations. Here the convolution unit is h↦ε(h)(1⊗1).

1.4givenF2F4F5F6F7algebra

Define Ψ:=(S⊗S)τΔ:H→H⊗H. Parenthesize the coassociative fourfold coproduct using [F7] as ∑h(1)⊗(h(2))(1)⊗(h(2))(2)⊗h(3). In Ψ∗Δ, the adjacent middle product is S((h(2))(1))(h(2))(2), so the left antipode equation and then the counit equation give (Ψ∗Δ)(h)=∑S(h(2))h(3)⊗S(h(1))h(4)=∑1⊗S(h(1))h(2)=ε(h)(1⊗1). In Δ∗Ψ, the adjacent middle product is (h(2))(1)S((h(2))(2)), so the right antipode equation and then the counit equation give (Δ∗Ψ)(h)=∑h(1)S(h(4))⊗h(2)S(h(3))=∑h(1)S(h(2))⊗1=ε(h)(1⊗1). The tensor maps are well-defined by [F6], and coassociativity makes these contractions independent of the chosen Sweedler expression.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F1F5algebra

Two-sided convolution inverses are unique by the calculation in step 1.1, applied with common map m in Hom⁡k(H⊗H,H). Thus ϕ=ψ and S(ab)=S(b)S(a). Evaluating S∗idH=uε at 1 and using Δ(1)=1⊗1, ε(1)=1 gives S(1)=1.

2.2step 1.1step 1.3step 1.4F4

Uniqueness of the two-sided inverse of Δ in this convolution algebra, by step 1.1, gives Φ=Ψ, which is the asserted anti-comultiplication identity.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F4F5∎

Since ε is an algebra map, applying it to ∑S(h(1))h(2)=ε(h)1 gives (ε∘S)∗ε=ε in Hom⁡k(H,k). The convolution unit there is ε, so ε∘S=ε. Together with steps 1.1 and 2.1, this proves all assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Hopf algebras and antipodes.

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources