How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniqueness and anti-multiplicativity and anti-comultiplicativity of the antipode
Statement
Let be a Hopf algebra over a field , with antipode , multiplication , unit , comultiplication , and counit . Then is unique, , and . Moreover, for all ,
where is the tensor flip. In particular, these are consequences of the convolution-inverse definition; they are not extra axioms.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Hopf algebra over , with the structure maps named in the Statement.
A bialgebra has and as unital algebra maps, with (Bialgebras and bialgebra maps).
The coalgebra on has and counit (The tensor product of two coalgebras is a coalgebra).
The algebra on has and unit (The tensor product of -algebras has multiplication ).
On , convolution is , it is associative, and its unit is (Convolution of linear maps is associative and unital).
The antipode equations are (Hopf algebras and antipodes).
Tensor products of linear maps and the flip are well-defined, and reassociation of the iterated tensor products is coherent (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially, Associator naturality, pentagon, unit triangle and symmetry hexagons on elementary tensors).
Tensor powers use the stated canonical tensor-unit and associator identifications (Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums).
Proof
If are two two-sided convolution inverses of the same map in a unital associative convolution algebra with unit , then . Taking proves uniqueness of the antipode.
Give convolution using the coalgebra of [F2] and the algebra of . Define and , which are well-defined by [F6]; thus . Both are two-sided inverses of : and by the antipode equations at , multiplicativity of , and multiplicativity of ; also and by first contracting or and then the remaining antipode pair. The right side is the convolution unit on by [F2].
Give convolution using on the source and the tensor-product algebra on the target. The map is a two-sided inverse of : and by multiplicativity of and the two antipode equations. Here the convolution unit is .
Define . Parenthesize the coassociative fourfold coproduct using [F7] as . In , the adjacent middle product is , so the left antipode equation and then the counit equation give . In , the adjacent middle product is , so the right antipode equation and then the counit equation give . The tensor maps are well-defined by [F6], and coassociativity makes these contractions independent of the chosen Sweedler expression.
Two-sided convolution inverses are unique by the calculation in step 1.1, applied with common map in . Thus and . Evaluating at and using , gives .
Uniqueness of the two-sided inverse of in this convolution algebra, by step 1.1, gives , which is the asserted anti-comultiplication identity.
Since is an algebra map, applying it to gives in . The convolution unit there is , so . Together with steps 1.1 and 2.1, this proves all assertions.
Depends on
- Bialgebras and bialgebra maps
- Hopf algebras and antipodes
- Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums
- Convolution of linear maps is associative and unital
- Associator naturality, pentagon, unit triangle and symmetry hexagons on elementary tensors
- The tensor product of two coalgebras is a coalgebra
- Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially
- The tensor product of $R$-algebras has multiplication $(a\otimes b)(a'\otimes b')=aa'\otimes bb'$
Used by
- The left dual of a finite-dimensional Hopf module Definition
- Coideals, ring ideals, Hopf ideals, and subbialgebras Example
- A commutative or cocommutative Hopf algebra has involutive antipode Lemma
- Double coalgebra, multiplicativity, and antipode Lemma
- Double crossing laws and associativity Lemma
- Right duals and the antipode twist on biduals Lemma
- The coinvariant projection of a right-right Hopf module Lemma
- The finite dual is a right regular Hopf module Lemma
- Quasi-Hopf and weak-Hopf extensions change different axioms Remark
- Evaluation, coevaluation, and triangle identities for left duals Theorem
- Finite double and its canonical quasitriangular structure Theorem
- Finite Hopf algebras have one-dimensional integral spaces and bijective antipode Theorem
- Hopf quotients, kernels of Hopf maps, and tensor products Theorem
- Hopf–Maschke theorem by integral averaging Theorem
- Modules over the finite double are left-left Yetter–Drinfeld modules Theorem
- The finite dual is a coalgebra and descends through bialgebras and Hopf algebras Theorem
- The fundamental theorem of right-right Hopf modules Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Hopf algebras and antipodes.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hans-Jürgen Schneider, Lectures on Hopf algebras, notes by Sonia Natale (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof and Mykola Semenyakin, A brief introduction to quantum groups (standard reference, not scraped)