Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coideals, ring ideals, Hopf ideals, and subbialgebras

Example

Let k be a field of characteristic different from 2, and let H=k[x] have primitive Hopf structure Δ(x)=1⊗x+x⊗1, ε(x)=0, S(x)=−x. The subspace kx is a coalgebra coideal but not a ring ideal; the ring ideal (x2) is not a coalgebra coideal; and (x) is a Hopf ideal. Separately, k[t]⊂k[Z], spanned by tn for n≥0, is a subbialgebra but not a Hopf subalgebra.

Verification

Given: A field k with char⁡(k)≠2, the primitive polynomial Hopf structure from the planned HH-4 construction, and the group algebra k[Z] with generator t.

[F1] Subcoalgebras, coideals, and quotient coalgebras: a coideal J has ε(J)=0 and Δ(J) contained in the sum of the images of J⊗C and C⊗J; under AC this is written J⊗C+C⊗J.

[F2] Group algebras, finite-group function algebras, and polynomial Hopf algebras: the polynomial generator is primitive and its antipode is −x; the group elements form the basis of k[Z], are group-like, and have antipode inversion.

[F3] Hopf ideals and Hopf subalgebras: a subbialgebra is a subspace equipped with a bialgebra structure for which inclusion is a bialgebra map; a Hopf subalgebra is such a subbialgebra stable under the antipode, and a Hopf ideal is an ideal, counital coideal, and antipode-stable.

[F4] Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring: every polynomial modulo the monic polynomial x2 has a unique remainder of degree below 2, so 1,xˉ form a basis of k[x]/(x2).

[F5] Left, right and two-sided ideals: a two-sided ideal is closed under left and right multiplication by every ring element.

[F6] The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product: elementary tensors of basis vectors form a basis of the tensor product.

[F7] Uniqueness and anti-multiplicativity and anti-comultiplicativity of the antipode: every antipode is anti-multiplicative, so S(ab)=S(b)S(a).

[F8] Multivariate polynomial and Laurent rings over commutative rings, domains and fraction fields: k[x] is free as a k-vector space on the monomials 1,x,x2,….

1.1givenF1F2F8algebra

The line J=kx is a coideal: 1⊗x lies in the image of H⊗J→H⊗H, x⊗1 lies in the image of J⊗H→H⊗H, and ε(x)=0. Linearity gives both inclusions for every scalar multiple of x. It is not a ring ideal because x∈J but x⋅x=x2∉kx, as the distinct monomials x,x2 are linearly independent by [F8].

1.2givenF1F2F4F5F6algebra

The set (x2) is a ring ideal by [F5], but it is not a coideal. Let q:k[x]→k[x]/(x2) be the quotient map. The coideal image condition would force (q⊗q)Δ(x2)=0; instead Δ(x2)=1⊗x2+2x⊗x+x2⊗1, so (q⊗q)Δ(x2)=2xˉ⊗xˉ≠0. By [F4] xˉ≠0, and by [F6] xˉ⊗xˉ is a nonzero tensor-basis element; 2≠0 by the characteristic hypothesis.

1.3givenF2F3F7algebra

The ideal (x) is a Hopf ideal. It is a two-sided ideal, ε(x)=0, and each term of Δ(x)=1⊗x+x⊗1 lies in the sum of the images of H⊗(x) and (x)⊗H. Since Δ is an algebra map, for any f∈k[x], Δ(xf)=Δ(x)Δ(f) lies in the sum of those images: in each product of a term with x in one factor and a term of Δ(f), the factor containing x remains in (x). Also S(xf)=S(f)S(x)=−S(f)x∈(x) by [F7], and ε(xf)=0. Thus all conditions in [F3] hold.

2.1givenF2F3algebra∎

In k[Z], the elements tn for n∈Z form a basis by [F2], so those with n≥0 form a basis of K:=span⁡{tn:n≥0}. Restrict multiplication and unit to K, define ΔK linearly on this basis by ΔK(tn)=tn⊗tn, and let εK be the restriction of ε. For m,n≥0, tmtn=tm+n, ΔK(tm+n)=(tm⊗tm)(tn⊗tn), and εK(tm+n)=εK(tm)εK(tn)=1, with ΔK(1)=1⊗1 and εK(1)=1; bilinearity extends these equations to K, so ΔK and εK are unital algebra maps. Coassociativity and both counit identities hold on each basis element because tn is group-like, and hence hold on all of K by linearity. The inclusion K↪k[Z] preserves multiplication, unit, coproduct, and counit on the basis and therefore is a bialgebra map. Thus K is a subbialgebra by [F3], proved directly from its structure maps without using the AC-qualified tensor-subspace shorthand. But S(t)=t−1∉K, since all tn, n∈Z, are linearly independent; hence K is not a Hopf subalgebra.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources