Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Convolution of linear maps is associative and unital

Statement

Let k be a field, let C be a k-coalgebra with comultiplication ΔC and counit εC, and let A be a unital associative k-algebra with multiplication mA and unit map uA. On the k-vector space Hom⁡k(C,A) define

f∗g:=mA(f⊗g)ΔC.

This is a well-defined associative multiplication with two-sided unit uAεC. The assertion holds without a finite-dimensionality assumption on either C or A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k is a field, C has linear maps satisfying the coassociativity and counit equations, and A has an associative multiplication and a two-sided unit.

[F1]

Every tensor is a finite sum of elementary tensors, and tensor powers are associated using the canonical coherent identifications (Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums).

[F2]

Linear maps induce unique tensor-product linear maps, with (f⊗g)(c⊗d)=f(c)⊗g(d) (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).

[F3]

A k-algebra is unital and associative, and its multiplication is bilinear (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms).

[F4]

Reassociation maps on iterated tensor products are coherent (Associator naturality, pentagon, unit triangle and symmetry hexagons on elementary tensors).

[F5]

A coalgebra comultiplication is coassociative and its counit satisfies both contraction identities (Coalgebra and coalgebra map over a field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2F3construct

For f,g∈Hom⁡k(C,A), [F2] gives the linear map f⊗g:C⊗C→A⊗A; composing it with ΔC and mA defines a linear map f∗g:C→A. The finite-sum tensor convention [F1], bilinearity of tensoring maps, and bilinearity of mA make ∗ bilinear in f,g.

1.2givenF3F4F5algebra

For f,g,h∈Hom⁡k(C,A) and c∈C, write the finite iterated coproduct as ΔC(2)(c)=∑c(1)⊗c(2)⊗c(3). Coassociativity from [F5] says this is the same tensor whether formed by ΔC⊗id or id⊗ΔC, with the canonical reassociation justified by [F4]; associativity of mA then gives ((f∗g)∗h)(c)=∑(f(c(1))g(c(2)))h(c(3))=∑f(c(1))(g(c(2))h(c(3)))=(f∗(g∗h))(c). Thus ∗ is associative.

1.3givenF3F5algebra

The left product with uAεC satisfies ((uAεC)∗f)(c)=∑εC(c(1))f(c(2))=f(c) by the left counit equation in [F5] and the unit law in A; the right product satisfies (f∗(uAεC))(c)=∑f(c(1))εC(c(2))=f(c) by the right counit equation. Hence uAεC is a two-sided unit.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Steps 1.1–1.3 define a bilinear associative multiplication and verify its two-sided unit on every c∈C. No step requires a basis, a dual, or a dimension bound, so the result holds in arbitrary dimension.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources