How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hopf–Maschke theorem by integral averaging
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra as in Hopf algebras and antipodes over a field . Then is semisimple as a ring (A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple), that is, its left regular module is a direct sum of simple left submodules (Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules), if and only if there exists a left integral with . In that case can be normalized so that .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero finite-dimensional Hopf algebra over . The trivial left -module has action , and is a surjective left -module map.
Hopf algebras and antipodes: is a unital algebra and counital coalgebra with algebra maps and antipode satisfying .
Left and right integrals and integral functionals: a left integral satisfies for all .
Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module: a unital left module has an associative, unital scalar action; in particular the counit action makes a left -module.
Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules: a left module is semisimple when it is an internal direct sum of simple submodules.
A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple: is semisimple as a ring exactly when its left regular module is semisimple.
Finite matrix and module preliminaries: right inverses, rank invariance, finite length and nilpotent trace: every submodule of a finite direct sum of simple modules has a complement.
Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module and Submodule of a module: a submodule of the regular left -module is an additive subgroup closed under left multiplication by every element of ; in this proof these submodules are called left ideals.
Proof
Suppose is semisimple. By [F4]–[F5], write its left regular module as a direct sum of simple submodules, which are left ideals by [F8]. Only finitely many summands can be nonzero: if and there were more than nonzero summands, choosing one nonzero vector from each of distinct summands would give linearly independent vectors in . Thus is a finite direct sum of simple modules.
Conversely suppose a left integral has and put . Then is a left integral and . For every , . The first equality inserts ; the second uses anti-multiplicativity [F7]; the third uses multiplicativity of ; the fourth uses .
The kernel is a left ideal (in the sense of [F8]) since is an algebra map. By [F6], choose a left -submodule with . The restriction is injective because , and is surjective because and . Its inverse is -linear. Set ; then and .
Let be any left ideal of , meaning a submodule of the regular left module as in [F8]. Fix a finite basis of . Start with an empty list and append a vector of outside the current span while one exists; this process stops after at most choices and yields a basis of . Next append each that is outside the current span. This gives a basis of extending the basis of , so projection onto along the span of the appended vectors gives a -linear map with . Define . The values lie in because takes values in and is a left ideal. The tensor identity in step 1.2 gives , so is -linear. For , , whence by [F1]. Thus is a retraction onto , and .
Every submodule of the regular module is a left ideal by [F8] and therefore has a complement by step 2.2. Induct on : a nonzero finite-dimensional module has a nonzero submodule of least positive dimension (among the finitely many possible dimensions); it is simple because any proper nonzero submodule would have smaller positive dimension. Split . If , step 2.2 gives for some submodule ; for any , write . Since , lies in , and , so . Thus every submodule of has a complement in . Induction makes a finite direct sum of simple submodules, so is semisimple. Hence is a semisimple ring by [F5]. The forward and reverse implications prove the equivalence.
Remarks
This criterion concerns semisimplicity of as an algebra. It does not assert that is semisimple or that in arbitrary characteristic.
Depends on
- Hopf algebras and antipodes
- Left and right integrals and integral functionals
- Uniqueness and anti-multiplicativity and anti-comultiplicativity of the antipode
- Finite matrix and module preliminaries: right inverses, rank invariance, finite length and nilpotent trace
- Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module
- Submodule of a module
- Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules
- A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Paolo Saracco, Notes on Hopf Modules, Integrals and Frobenius Hopf Algebras (course notes, 2019) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Erasmus Mini-Course on Hopf Algebras (lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)