Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hopf–Maschke theorem by integral averaging

Statement

Let H≠0 be a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra as in Hopf algebras and antipodes over a field k. Then H is semisimple as a ring (A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple), that is, its left regular module is a direct sum of simple left submodules (Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules), if and only if there exists a left integral Λ∈H with ε(Λ)≠0. In that case Λ can be normalized so that ε(Λ)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero finite-dimensional Hopf algebra H over k. The trivial left H-module k has action h⋅c=ε(h)c, and ε:H→k is a surjective left H-module map.

[F1]

Hopf algebras and antipodes: H is a unital algebra and counital coalgebra with Δ,ε algebra maps and antipode S satisfying ∑S(h1)h2=∑h1S(h2)=ε(h)1.

[F2]

Left and right integrals and integral functionals: a left integral Λ satisfies hΛ=ε(h)Λ for all h.

[F3]

Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module: a unital left module has an associative, unital scalar action; in particular the counit action makes k a left H-module.

[F4]

Semisimple modules as direct sums of simple modules: a left module is semisimple when it is an internal direct sum of simple submodules.

[F5]

A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple: H is semisimple as a ring exactly when its left regular module is semisimple.

[F6]

Finite matrix and module preliminaries: right inverses, rank invariance, finite length and nilpotent trace: every submodule of a finite direct sum of simple modules has a complement.

[F7]

Uniqueness and anti-multiplicativity and anti-comultiplicativity of the antipode: S(ab)=S(b)S(a) and Δ(S(a))=∑S(a2)⊗S(a1).

[F8]

Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module and Submodule of a module: a submodule of the regular left H-module is an additive subgroup closed under left multiplication by every element of H; in this proof these submodules are called left ideals.

Proof

1.1F4F5F8givenchoosealgebra

Suppose H is semisimple. By [F4]–[F5], write its left regular module as a direct sum of simple submodules, which are left ideals by [F8]. Only finitely many summands can be nonzero: if n=dim⁡kH and there were more than n nonzero summands, choosing one nonzero vector from each of n+1 distinct summands would give n+1 linearly independent vectors in H. Thus H is a finite direct sum of simple modules.

1.2F1F2F7algebra

Conversely suppose a left integral t has ε(t)≠0 and put Λ=t/ε(t). Then Λ is a left integral and ε(Λ)=1. For every h∈H, ∑hΛ1⊗S(Λ2)=∑h1Λ1⊗S(Λ2)S(h2)h3=∑h1Λ1⊗S(h2Λ2)h3=∑(h1Λ)1⊗S((h1Λ)2)h2=∑Λ1⊗S(Λ2)h. The first equality inserts ∑S(h2)h3=ε(h2)1; the second uses anti-multiplicativity [F7]; the third uses multiplicativity of Δ; the fourth uses h1Λ=ε(h1)Λ.

2.1step 1.1F1F3F6F8algebra

The kernel J=ker⁡ε is a left ideal (in the sense of [F8]) since ε is an algebra map. By [F6], choose a left H-submodule C with H=J⊕C. The restriction ε∣C:C→k is injective because C∩J=0, and is surjective because ε(H)=k and ε(J)=0. Its inverse s:k→C⊂H is H-linear. Set Λ=s(1); then hΛ=s(h⋅1)=ε(h)Λ and ε(Λ)=1.

2.2step 1.2F1F8algebra

Let J be any left ideal of H, meaning a submodule of the regular left module as in [F8]. Fix a finite basis e1,…,en of H. Start with an empty list and append a vector of J outside the current span while one exists; this process stops after at most n choices and yields a basis of J. Next append each ei that is outside the current span. This gives a basis of H extending the basis of J, so projection onto J along the span of the appended vectors gives a k-linear map p:H→J with p∣J=idJ. Define P(v)=∑Λ1p(S(Λ2)v). The values lie in J because p takes values in J and J is a left ideal. The tensor identity in step 1.2 gives P(hv)=∑Λ1p(S(Λ2)hv)=∑hΛ1p(S(Λ2)v)=hP(v), so P is H-linear. For v∈J, S(Λ2)v∈J, whence P(v)=∑Λ1S(Λ2)v=ε(Λ)v=v by [F1]. Thus P is a retraction onto J, and H=J⊕ker⁡P.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2F5F8givenchoosealgebra∎

Every submodule of the regular module H is a left ideal by [F8] and therefore has a complement by step 2.2. Induct on dim⁡kH: a nonzero finite-dimensional module has a nonzero submodule U of least positive dimension (among the finitely many possible dimensions); it is simple because any proper nonzero submodule would have smaller positive dimension. Split H=U⊕M. If L≤M, step 2.2 gives H=L⊕C for some submodule C; for any m∈M, write m=l+c. Since l∈L≤M, c=m−l lies in C∩M, and L∩(C∩M)=0, so M=L⊕(C∩M). Thus every submodule of M has a complement in M. Induction makes M a finite direct sum of simple submodules, so H=U⊕M is semisimple. Hence H is a semisimple ring by [F5]. The forward and reverse implications prove the equivalence.

Remarks

This criterion concerns semisimplicity of H as an algebra. It does not assert that H∗ is semisimple or that S2=id in arbitrary characteristic.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources