How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The module category of a bialgebra and its tensor action
Definition
Let be a field and let be a -vector space with associative unital multiplication , unit , coassociative comultiplication , and counit . Assume and are unital algebra maps; this is the bialgebra interface used on this page. A left -module is a unital left module in the sense of Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module: its action satisfies and . Let be the category whose objects are all left -modules and whose morphisms are -linear maps satisfying for every and .
For left -modules , give the algebraic tensor product the candidate action
The sums are finite algebraic tensor sums; the tensor product and scalar conventions are those of Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums. The candidate unit object is with . For morphisms and , the candidate tensor morphism is the usual linear map determined by through Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups.
These formulas specify the proposed tensor operations; Bialgebra module tensor actions and their coherence ↗ proves that they are module actions and that the canonical associator and unit maps are morphisms in .
Depends on
Used by
- The componentwise formula can fail to define a tensor action Counterexample
- Braiding on the module category and triangular structures Definition
- The left dual of a finite-dimensional Hopf module Definition
- A two-dimensional module and its Taft-algebra dual Example
- Tensor products of modules over a bialgebra without an antipode Example
- The diagonal tensor action of ℂ[C₂] on trivial and sign modules Example
- The tensor product and contragredient dual of a finite-group module Example
- The trivial universal R-matrix for the group algebra of a two-element group Example
- Right duals and the antipode twist on biduals Lemma
- A quasitriangular structure gives and is recovered from a module braiding Theorem
- Bialgebra module tensor actions and their coherence Theorem
- Evaluation, coevaluation, and triangle identities for left duals Theorem
- Finite double and its canonical quasitriangular structure Theorem
- Modules over the finite double are left-left Yetter–Drinfeld modules Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories (MIT 18.769 full course lecture notes, 2009) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Christoph Schweigert, Hopf algebras, quantum groups and topological field theory (Hamburg University full lecture notes, 2025) (standard reference, not scraped)