Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The module category of a bialgebra and its tensor action

Definition

Let k be a field and let H be a k-vector space with associative unital multiplication m, unit 1H, coassociative comultiplication Δ:H→H⊗kH, and counit ε:H→k. Assume Δ and ε are unital algebra maps; this is the bialgebra interface used on this page. A left H-module is a unital left module in the sense of Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module: its action satisfies 1Hv=v and (hh′)v=h(h′v). Let H-Mod be the category whose objects are all left H-modules and whose morphisms f:V→W are k-linear maps satisfying f(hv)=hf(v) for every h∈H and v∈V.

For left H-modules V,W, give the algebraic tensor product V⊗kW the candidate action

h⋅(v⊗w)=∑h(1)v⊗h(2)w,Δ(h)=∑h(1)⊗h(2).

The sums are finite algebraic tensor sums; the tensor product and scalar conventions are those of Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums. The candidate unit object is kε=k with h⋅c=ε(h)c. For morphisms f:V→V′ and g:W→W′, the candidate tensor morphism is the usual linear map f⊗g determined by (f⊗g)(v⊗w)=f(v)⊗g(w) through Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups.

These formulas specify the proposed tensor operations; Bialgebra module tensor actions and their coherence ↗ proves that they are module actions and that the canonical associator and unit maps are morphisms in H-Mod.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources