Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite tensor duality and basis-independent coevaluation

Statement

Let V,W be finite-dimensional k-vector spaces.

  1. The bilinear map V∗×W∗→(V⊗W)∗, (f,g)↦[v⊗w↦f(v)g(w)], induces an isomorphism V∗⊗W∗→(V⊗W)∗. For ordered bases (v1,…,vm) of V, (w1,…,wn) of W with dual bases (vi∗), (wj∗), the image of vi∗⊗wj∗ is the dual basis vector of vi⊗wj in the product basis of V⊗W.
  2. For every ordered basis (v1,…,vn) of V the element ∑i=1nvi∗⊗vi∈V∗⊗V is independent of the basis and corresponds to idV under the isomorphism V∗⊗V→Hom⁡(V,V), f⊗v↦[x↦f(x)v] (For finite-dimensional V, the canonical map V∗⊗FW→Hom⁡F(V,W) is an isomorphism). Its image under σV∗,V is the corresponding element ∑ivi⊗vi∗ of V⊗V∗.
  3. The evaluation ev:V∗⊗V→k, f⊗v↦f(v), and the coevaluation coev:k→V⊗V∗, 1↦∑ivi⊗vi∗, are independent of the basis and satisfy (idV⊗ev)∘αV,V∗,V∘(coev⊗idV)=idV and (ev⊗idV∗)∘αV∗,V,V∗−1∘(idV∗⊗coev)=idV∗, the unit isomorphisms k⊗V≅V, V⊗k≅V being understood.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, finite-dimensional k-vector spaces V,W, ordered bases (v1,…,vm) of V and (w1,…,wn) of W with their dual bases, and ordered bases of V written (v1,…,vn).

[F1]

The tensor product conventions: M⊗N is the tensor product over k with its universal property, every element is a finite sum of elementary tensors, the unit isomorphisms λN:k⊗N→N and ρM:M⊗k→M are given by r⊗n↦rn and m⊗r↦mr, and tensor powers are left-associated with V⊗0=k (Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums).

[F2]

The algebraic dual V∗ is the space of linear functionals on V (Linear functionals and the algebraic dual V∗=L(V,F)).

[F3]

The dual family (b∗)b∈B of a basis is defined by b∗(c)=δbc and linear extension (The dual family (b∗)b∈B associated to a Hamel basis B, defined by b∗(c)=δbc).

[F4]

If B=(b1,…,bn) is a basis of a finite-dimensional space, its dual family B∗ is a basis, so it is linearly independent and spans the dual space (The dual family of a finite basis is a basis of the dual space, with the same dimension).

[F5]

The elementary tensors of two bases form a basis of the tensor product (The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product).

[F6]

Coordinates with respect to an ordered basis are unique, so x=∑iλibi with λ the coordinate list of x; for the dual basis of a basis this gives f=∑if(bi)bi∗ and x=∑ibi∗(x)bi (A finite list v:n→V is an ordered basis if and only if every x∈V equals ∑i<nλivi for exactly one λ:n→F; those scalars are the coordinates of x in that ordered basis).

[F7]

For finite-dimensional V the map Φ:V∗⊗W→Hom⁡(V,W), ϕ⊗w↦[y↦ϕ(y)w], is an isomorphism with inverse Ψ(T)=∑ivi∗⊗T(vi) (For finite-dimensional V, the canonical map V∗⊗FW→Hom⁡F(V,W) is an isomorphism).

[F8]

The symmetry and associativity isomorphisms act on elementary tensors by σM,N(m⊗n)=n⊗m and αL,M,N((l⊗m)⊗n)=l⊗(m⊗n) (Symmetry and associativity isomorphisms for tensor products over a commutative ring).

[F9]

The unit isomorphisms λN:k⊗N→N and ρM:M⊗k→M are isomorphisms with the stated formulas (The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2F3F4F5algebra

Claim 1. For fixed (f,g)∈V∗×W∗ the pairing V×W→k, (v,w)↦f(v)g(w), is k-bilinear, so it defines a functional θ(f,g)∈(V⊗W)∗ with θ(f,g)(v⊗w)=f(v)g(w) by the universal property in [F1], the star denoting the space of linear functionals [F2]; the assignment (f,g)↦θ(f,g) is itself k-bilinear, so it induces a k-linear map θ:V∗⊗W∗→(V⊗W)∗ by [F1]. On the one hand (vi∗⊗wj∗) is a basis of V∗⊗W∗ by [F4] and [F5], on the other hand the dual vectors (vi⊗wj)∗ in (V⊗W)∗ of the product basis (vi⊗wj) (a basis by [F5]) form a basis of (V⊗W)∗ by [F4]; and θ(vi∗⊗wj∗)(vk⊗wl)=vi∗(vk)wj∗(wl)=δikδjl=(vi⊗wj)∗(vk⊗wl) by [F3], so θ(vi∗⊗wj∗)=(vi⊗wj)∗ because linear functionals agreeing on the spanning product basis agree. If z=∑i,jcijvi∗⊗wj∗ satisfies θ(z)=0, then ∑i,jcij(vi⊗wj)∗=0 and linear independence of the dual product basis [F4] gives all cij=0, so θ is injective; and every L∈(V⊗W)∗ is L=∑i,jdij(vi⊗wj)∗=θ(∑i,jdijvi∗⊗wj∗) by spanning [F4], so θ is surjective. Hence θ is an isomorphism with the stated values on the dual product basis.

1.2givenF6F7F8algebra

Claim 2. By [F7] the map Φ:V∗⊗V→Hom⁡(V,V) is an isomorphism, so the preimage of idV is unique and any two bases (v1,…,vn) give the same element as soon as both give idV. For y∈V the coordinate expansion of [F6] gives y=∑ivi∗(y)vi, hence Φ(∑ivi∗⊗vi)(y)=∑ivi∗(y)vi=y on a spanning set of V, so Φ(∑ivi∗⊗vi)=idV and the element ∑ivi∗⊗vi is the unique preimage of idV, independent of the basis. Its image under σV∗,V is ∑ivi⊗vi∗ by the elementary-tensor formula of [F8].

2.1step 1.2F1F6F8F9algebra

Claim 3. The pairing V∗×V→k, (f,v)↦f(v), is k-bilinear, so it induces ev:V∗⊗V→k, f⊗v↦f(v), by [F1]; evaluation is basis-free. The coevaluation coev:k→V⊗V∗ is defined by 1↦∑ivi⊗vi∗, which by step 1.2 is independent of the basis and equals σV∗,V applied to the unique preimage of idV; it is k-linear because k is spanned by 1. For the first zigzag, use the conventions of [F1] and the formulas of [F8] and [F9]: for x∈V, (coev⊗idV)(1⊗x)=∑i(vi⊗vi∗)⊗x, the associator sends this to ∑ivi⊗(vi∗⊗x), and (idV⊗ev) sends it to ∑ivi⊗vi∗(x)=x⊗1 by [F6], which the unit isomorphism ρV identifies with x; both composites are linear in x, so they agree everywhere. For the second zigzag, f⊗1 maps under (idV∗⊗coev) to ∑if⊗(vi⊗vi∗), the inverse associator sends this to ∑i(f⊗vi)⊗vi∗, and (ev⊗idV∗) sends it to ∑if(vi)(1⊗vi∗)=1⊗f by the dual expansion of [F6], which the unit isomorphism λV∗ identifies with f; again both composites are linear, so equality on the spanning elements f⊗1 proves the identity.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 prove claims 1, 2 and 3 respectively, with the dual product basis values, the basis independence of the preimage of idV, and both zigzag identities established.

Remarks

  • Infinite dimension is deliberately outside the claim. No surjectivity of V∗⊗W∗→(V⊗W)∗ is claimed in infinite dimension, and the companion page's An infinite-dimensional tensor-dual functional outside the image ↗ exhibits a functional outside the image when V has an infinite basis, so the finite-dimensional hypothesis of part 1 cannot simply be dropped.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources